US–Policy Req for Evidence, Notices of Intent to Deny | KPMG | GLOBAL
close
Share with your friends

United States – Updated Policy on Requests for Evidence, Notices of Intent to Deny

US–Policy Req for Evidence, Notices of Intent to Deny

This report covers recently-issued guidance from the United States immigration authorities concerning denial of visa applications or petitions.

1000

CONTACTS

Related content

flash-alert-2018-105

On July 13, 2018, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released a new policy memorandum (PDF 113 KB)granting immigration adjudicators discretion to deny visa applications or petitions without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) in cases where initial evidence is missing or does not establish eligibility. 

The guidance will apply to all petitions and applications received after September 11, 2018.

WHY THIS MATTERS

As noted, under the new policy, USCIS officers do not need to first issue an RFE or NOID when they deny applications and petitions when it has been determined that the filing failed to include sufficient initial evidence.  

This could result in an immediate uptick of visa application denials as the new policy grants USCIS adjudicators increased authority to by-pass the RFE or NOID step; a crucial process that provides the petitioning employer or applicant an opportunity to respond with supplemental information when there is a lack of sufficient evidence in the original filing.

Background

Prior to the publication of this memo, USCIS adjudicating officers who were not convinced a case was approvable were instructed to issue an RFE or a NOID to address deficiencies in the petition filing, unless there was “no possibility” that additional evidence could be submitted to fix the deficiency.1  This instruction is now set to change effective September 11, 2018.

An RFE is a notice issued by a USCIS adjudicator formally requesting additional information or supplemental documentation before he or she can make a final determination on the visa application.  Similarly, a NOID is a preliminary decision by the USCIS adjudicator to deny an application based on an initial determination that the petitioning employer or applicant failed to meet the minimum eligibility requirements.  In either scenario, the issuance of an RFE or NOID provides the petitioner or applicant an opportunity to respond to the adjudicator’s initial findings.

What the New Policy Does

As noted above, the new policy grants USCIS officers full discretion to deny applications and petitions without first issuing an RFE or NOID where USCIS determines the filing failed to include sufficient initial evidence.  USCIS cites2 two examples of filings that may be denied without first issuing an RFE or NOID based on a lack of sufficient initial evidence:

  • “Waiver applications submitted with little to no supporting evidence.”

OR

  • “Cases where the regulations, the statute, or form instructions require the submission of an official document or other form or evidence establishing eligibility at the time of filing and there is no submission.  For example, family-based or employment-based categories where an Affidavit of Support (Form I-864), if required, was not submitted with the Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (Form I-485).”

KPMG NOTE

What Is Clear under the Policy and What Is Unclear   

Although the new policy memorandum instructs adjudicators to deny petitions without first issuing an RFE if the case lacks sufficient “initial” evidence, it is not yet clear how USCIS will interpret this standard and implement the new guidance.  The new policy is not a complete elimination of the RFE or NOID.  The new policy outlines it is still appropriate for USCIS adjudicators to issue RFEs and NOIDs where eligibility for the immigration benefit sought cannot be established by the evidence submitted in the filing.  Further, the memo instructs USCIS adjudications to identify any missing evidence specifically required by the applicable statute, regulation, or form instruction, and provide examples of evidence that may be submitted to establish such eligibility.  Thus, the new policy is not an absolute departure from the practice of providing the petitioner or applicant an opportunity to provide additional corroborating evidence supporting eligibility. 

Taking Precautionary and Other Important Steps   

We at KPMG Law LLP in Canada encourage all petitioners and applicants to continue working with their immigration counsel to take necessary precautions and to make sure all visa petitions and applications are filed with the requisite documentation and evidence before an application for immigration benefit is submitted to USCIS.

What the New Policy Reveals: Expanding Enforcement

This memo, in connection with an earlier memo published by the USCIS on June 28, 2018, instructing USCIS officers to issue a Notice to Appear (NTA) initiating removal proceedings for individuals no longer maintaining lawful presence following a denied application for immigration benefit, shows the USCIS is focused on expanding its enforcement abilities.  For an analysis of the June 28, 2018 USCIS policy memo directing USCIS to issue NTAs, see GMS Flash Alert 2018-103 (August 2, 2018).    

KPMG NOTE

Preparing for the Policy Change 

We can expect to see increased denial rates from the USCIS with the implementation of the new policy memo.  As a recourse, applications to extend nonimmigrant visa status (including common temporary employment-based visas: H-1B, L-1, O-1, and others) should be filed as early as possible (up to six (6) months prior to expiration) to allow an opportunity to re-file should the initial application be denied.  Additionally, employers and applicants should consider utilizing USCIS’s “premium processing” service on all eligible applications to mitigate potential lapses in nonimmigrant status and the accrual of unlawful presence should the initial application be denied. 

Future Updates  

Our office is closely monitoring the implementation of this new guidance by USCIS and its potential impact on petitioners and applicants.  We will continue to provide you with any updates.  

FOOTNOTES

1  To see Policy Memo: “Requests for Evidence and Notices of Intent to Deny” (June 3, 2013), click here.

2  To see the announcement on the USCIS Web site, click here.  Also see Policy Memo: “Issuance of Certain RFEs and NOIDs; Revisions to Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) Chapter 10.5(a), Chapter 10.5(b)” (PDF 113 KB) (July 13, 2018). 

* Please note that KPMG LLP (U.S.) does not provide any immigration services.  However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.   

 

The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Canada.

<p>© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity.</p> <p>Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.<br> </p>

Flash Alert is an Global Mobility Services publication of KPMG LLPs Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

Connect with us

 

Request for proposal

 

Submit