This report covers some important administrative/form changes and additional employer obligations with respect to employing foreign nationals in Germany.
Germany’s Bundesagentur für Arbeit (or Federal Employment Agency, hereinafter (“FEA”) has (i) published several new forms to be completed, which require more detailed information, and (ii) increased the obligations of companies employing or hosting a non-European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA)/Swiss national in Germany. Those forms also hint at a revised practice concerning if and to what extent allowances can be considered for purposes of boosting a foreign base salary to a level comparable to the local labor market.
A core principle of German immigration law for several years has been that working conditions of non-EU/EEA/Swiss nationals shall not be less favorable than those of German nationals. In the past, the FEA focused only on two working conditions in detail. The new practice means potentially increased scrutiny and more detailed examination of other working conditions.
Companies might need to amend their standard assignment and employment contracts for Germany in order to account for this, to provide more detailed information to the FEA, and to change the terms of paying allowances where international assignments are concerned.
Some German residence titles1 for the purpose of working in Germany require the FEA’s internal approval. If an approval is required, the FEA will perform a labor market test pursuant to Sec. 39 AufenthG2. Such a labor market test may encompass assessing whether the working conditions of a non-EU/EEA/Swiss national are comparable to those of a local employee and, in limited scenarios, whether privileged3, unemployed workforce is available.
One of the FEA’s main objectives when a non-EU/EEA/Swiss national immigrates to Germany is to make sure that such foreigners will not work in Germany under working conditions less favorable compared to those of local employees. This is regulated in Sec. 39 (2) Sentence 1 AufenthG for all permission categories, except the ICT Card and Mobile ICT Card; for those two permission categories a more specific regulation applies, but it has nearly comparable requirements.4
Working conditions explicitly mentioned in this regard by Sec. 39 (2) Sentence 3 AufenthG are:
For years, the FEA has been referring in its forms only to the working conditions of “salary” and “working hours” and has accordingly made requests about those.
With effect from May 2018, the FEA has revised its main form and now requires the following information related to “other working conditions”:
The new main forms are available online.5 Specific forms are to be used for internal approval procedures under the international staff exchange rule6 and for the so-called ICT-Card / Mobile ICT-Card.7
A second important change concerns employing / hosting companies in Germany having to indicate (from their end) the comparable salary of a local employee (within their company) and confirm that it is indeed comparable.
This latter change is surprising and appears to shift responsibilities from the FEA to companies, even though any conclusion on comparability is subject to the FEA’s legal examination. In other words, any legal assessment is the bailiwick of the FEA, whereas companies only are obliged to provide accurate facts. The requirement that a company confirm the comparable salary of a local comparable employee is a departure from previous practice and blurs the differentiation in responsibilities that had existed.
Finally, a third important change has to do with the FEA – in cases of assignments – not considering allowances paid mainly to boost foreign salary that are not “at free disposal and committedly paid” to the assignee. It is clear that, for example, reimbursed housing allowances based on hotel receipts, etc. will not be considered anymore. The same applies if the housing is rented by the home or host company directly or via a relocation agency.
However, uncertainties remain whether per diems, cost of living allowances, and in-country transportation allowances will be considered. The FEA indicated in an e-mail correspondence of a general nature in response to an inquiry from KPMG Law in Germany on 24 May 2018, that the new guidelines on how to interpret Sec. 39 (2) AufenthG are currently with the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs for review, before they will be published.
MATTERS FOR COMPANIES TO CONSIDER IN LIGHT OF CHANGES
First, companies need to establish the “comparable” nature of salary and working hours of non-EU/EEA/Swiss nationals, whose residence titles are subject to an approval from the FEA; in addition, other working conditions as now specified need to be comparable. Examples of other working conditions are entitlement to annual leave and remuneration modalities with regard to overtime work.
Second, companies need to collect internally information on the salaries of local employees and communicate that information to the FEA. In some forms (those cited in Footnotes 6 and 7), even though the responsibility for assessing what a comparable salary is lies with the FEA, companies must now provide not only salary figures of a local employee in a comparable role, but also must de facto confirm the comparability to the FEA. At first glance, this appears contradictory to the heretofore legal allocation of responsibilities. Nonetheless, not following this request could lead to a denial or at least a delay. A judicial clarification – if it came to that – could take years, which would take a financial toll on a company and might end up being an amount (and time commitment) that is disproportional to the company’s need to transfer the non-EU/EEA/Swiss national to Germany as soon as possible.
Third, companies might need to restructure their concepts of remuneration during an assignment. From the get-go, assignees shall always receive housing allowances paid out to them. Additionally, the decision on which accommodation to rent and to what extent allowance for a specific accommodation shall be used needs to be up to the assignee.
In order to mitigate further uncertainties, companies might consider paying the common and aforementioned allowances as temporary “uplift” of the assignee’s base salary without further differentiation. This could also lead to other remuneration components being considered for boosting a foreign basis salary to a comparable level, if needed.
1 Residence title is (according to Sec. 4 (1) AufenthG) a legal umbrella term and, for example, covers Schengen C Visas, National D Visas, Residence Permits, and EU Blue Cards.
2 Act on the Residence, Economic Activity and Integration of Foreigners in the Federal Territory (abbreviated as “AufenthG” in German), available online (in English) can be found by clicking here.
3 This concerns, in particular, German nationals, EU, EEA, or Swiss nationals, as well as non-EU/EEA/Swiss nationals, who have been granted unrestricted labor market access for Germany.
4 This is the regulation of Sec. 39 (1) Sentence 2 AufenthG in conjunction with Sec. 10a (1) BeschV.
5 The main form can be accessed by clicking here (PDF 672 KB)
6 Pursuant to Sec. 18 (4) AufenthG in conjunction with Sec. 39 (2) AufenthG and Sec. 10 (1) BeschV. These forms can be accessed by clicking here (PDF 629 KB)
7 These forms can be accessed by clicking here (PDF 645 KB)
* Please note that KPMG LLP (U.S.) does not provide any immigration services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Germany.
© 2018 KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprfungsgesellschaft, a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
Flash Alert is an Global Mobility Services publication of KPMG LLPs Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.