The World Trade Organization (WTO) today reported that China has requested consultations with the United States under the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism regarding the U.S. tariff measures on certain Chinese goods that would allegedly be implemented under sections 301-310 of the Trade Act of 1974.
According to a WTO release, China claims the tariffs would be in excess of the U.S. bound rates and are inconsistent with provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and of the Dispute Settlement Understanding.
The request for consultations formally initiates a dispute in the WTO. Consultations give the parties an opportunity to discuss the matter and to find a satisfactory solution without proceeding further with litigation. After 60 days, if consultations have failed to resolve the dispute, the complainant may request adjudication by a panel.
U.S. response, aluminum and steel tariffs
In another tariff-related action, the United States submitted a communication to China and the WTO regarding China’s recent request for consultations on the section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs. According to a release from the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), China’s request for WTO consultations “…is completely baseless” because the U.S. section 232 tariffs address a national security threat to critical industries and are not part of a safeguard action. The USTR release continues that “there is no basis under WTO rules for China’s decision this week to raise tariffs against over $3 billion in U.S. exports.”
For more information, contact a professional with KPMG’s Trade & Customs practice:
Douglas Zuvich | +1 (312) 665-1022 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Andrew Siciliano | +1 (631) 425-6057 | email@example.com
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.