From 2004 to 2006, the Latin American economy grew at a rate not seen since the late 1970s. The 2008 crisis contracted that growth but, since 2010, the rate of growth has recovered and economic strength has returned.
Hong Kong (SAR) is a former British Crown Colony whose sovereignty was returned to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on 1 July 1997. The Hong Kong (SAR) government has traditionally adopted a minimal intervention approach to the economy.
Consistent with this approach, Hong Kong (SAR) has a relatively simple tax system, minimal competition law, a relatively unregulated business environment and practically no restrictions on foreign ownership. There are no exchange controls and limited restrictions on repatriation of profits.
The Basic Law, which came into effect on 1 July 1997, ensures the continuation of Hong Kong (SAR)’s capitalist economy and way of life for 50 years. The Basic Law is a constitutional document for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) that enshrines the important concepts of one country/jurisdiction, two systems, a high degree of autonomy and Hong Kong (SAR) people ruling Hong Kong (SAR). The laws previously in force in Hong Kong (SAR) (common law, rules of equity, ordinances, subordinate legislation and customary law) were maintained, except for those that contravened the Basic Law and subject to any amendments made by the Hong Kong (SAR) legislature. Consistent with the Basic Law, Hong Kong (SAR) continues to maintain its own tax system, which is separate from the PRC’s, the tax laws of which do not apply to the Hong Kong (SAR).
The major tax changes in Hong Kong (SAR) since the last edition of this report are as follows:
In Hong Kong (SAR), it is more common for an acquisition to take the form of a purchase of shares of a company as opposed to a purchase of its business and assets.
Persons (which include a corporation, partnership, trustee, whether incorporated or unincorporated, or body of persons) are only subject to profits tax on their profits arising in or derived from Hong Kong (SAR) from a trade, profession or business carried on in Hong Kong (SAR), except for any profits realized from sales of capital assets, which are exempt from profits tax. Sellers frequently are able to dispose of investments in shares free of profits tax.
By contrast, sales of certain assets may trigger a recapture of capital allowances claimed and possibly higher transfer duties (depending on the assets involved). These factors are likely to make asset acquisitions less attractive for the seller. However, the benefits of asset purchases should not be ignored, in particular, the potential to obtain deductions for the financing costs incurred on funds borrowed to finance the acquisition of business assets.
Some of the tax considerations relevant to each type of acquisition structure are discussed later in this report. The advantages and disadvantages are summarized at the end of the report.
Purchase of assets
For tax purposes, it is generally advisable for the purchase agreement to specify a commercially justifiable allocation of the purchase price among the assets, because all or part of the purchase price payable by a buyer may be eligible for tax relief in the form of capital allowances or deductions (either outright or over time), depending on the types of assets involved.
Tax-depreciation allowances arising from capital expenditure incurred on the acquisition of plant and machinery are generally computed with reference to the amount actually paid by the purchaser to the seller. However, the Commissioner of Inland Revenue (CIR) may apply discretion where an asset that qualifies for initial or annual allowances is sold and the buyer is a person over whom the seller has control or vice versa, or both the seller and the buyer are persons over whom some other person has control. In this case, if the CIR considers that the selling price is not representative of the asset’s true market value at the time of sale, the CIR is authorized to determine the true market value of the asset sold. The value so determined is used to compute the balancing allowance or balancing charge for the seller and the capital expenditure of the buyer on which initial and annual allowances may be claimed.
For commercial and industrial buildings and structures, the tax allowances are based on the ‘residue of expenditure’ immediately after the sale. The residue of expenditure is the amount of capital expenditure incurred in the construction of the building or structure, reduced by any initial, annual or balancing allowances that have already been granted or any notional amounts written off and increased by any balancing charges made when the building or structure was previously used as an industrial or commercial building or structure.
The portion of the purchase price representing the cost of acquiring goodwill is not deductible for profits tax purposes. Where certain conditions are met, the Inland Revenue Ordinance (IRO) provides for the following specific deductions for payments giving rise to intangible assets:
The Hong Kong (SAR) government has also proposed to introduce a super tax deduction for R&D expenditure that would allow a 300 percent tax deduction for the first HKD2 million of qualifying R&D expenditure and a 200 percent tax deduction for remaining expenditure.
The IRO grants initial and annual depreciation allowances on capital expenditure incurred in acquiring or constructing industrial buildings, commercial buildings and plant and machinery used in the production of assessable profits.The rates applicable for the 2017/18 year of assessment are as follows:Type of asset
|Type of asset||Initial allowance||Annual allowance|
|Industrial buildings||20 percent of qualifying expenditure||4 percent of qualifying expenditure|
|Commercial buildings||Zero||4 percent of qualifying expenditure|
|Plant and machinery||60 percent of qualifying expenditure||10, 20 or 30 percent of the tax written-down value, depending on the category of asset|
In addition, the IRO provides the following tax concessions:
Balancing charges or allowances may be triggered on specified occasions related to the cessation of use by the claimant having the relevant interest in a building or structure (e.g. when the building or structure has been demolished, destroyed or ceases to be used by the claimant). For qualifying plant and machinery, the sales proceeds (limited to cost) are deducted from the reducing value of the relevant pool. A balancing charge arises when, at the end of the basis period for a year of assessment, the reducing value of the pool is negative. Any excess of the sales proceeds above the original cost of the plant and machinery is not subject to profits tax. Such excess should be regarded as a profit arising from the sale of a capital asset.
Tax losses are not transferred on an asset acquisition. The benefit of any tax losses incurred by the seller company remains with the seller (subject to an increase or reduction by the amount of any balancing charges or allowances on the sale of any depreciable assets).
Hong Kong (SAR) does not have a franking or imputation regime.
Value added tax
There is currently no goods and services tax (GST) or value added tax (VAT) in Hong Kong (SAR).
Stamp duty is imposed on certain instruments dealing with the sale or transfer of immovable property situated in Hong Kong (SAR). ‘Immovable property’ is defined as land, any estate, right, interest or easement in or over any land, and things attached to land (e.g. buildings) or permanently fastened to anything attached to land.
As of 5 November 2016, the ad valorem stamp duty rates for the transfer of residential property were increased to a flat rate of 15 percent irrespective of the amount or value of consideration of the residential property concerned, unless specifically exempt or otherwise provided. For the transfer of non-residential property, the ad valorem stamp duty rates range from 1.5 percent on consideration of up to HKD2 million to up to 8.5 percent on consideration of more than HKD21.7 million. A lease of immovable property in Hong Kong (SAR) is chargeable to ad valorem stamp duty on a progressive scale ranging from 0.25 percent of average annual rent, where the term of the lease is uncertain, to 1 percent of average annual rent where the lease term exceeds 3 years.
A special stamp duty (SSD) is effective for residential properties acquired on or after 20 November 2010 and resold within 24 months. SSD applies in addition to the ad valorem rates of stamp duty already imposed. SSD is imposed on the full value of sales proceeds at penal rates of 5, 10 or
15 percent, depending on when the property is bought and sold.
As of 27 October 2012, the rates of SSD were increased for residential properties acquired on or after 27 October 2012 and range from 10 to 20 percent, depending on the holding period, which has been extended to 36 months.
A buyer’s stamp duty (BSD) on residential properties took effect from 27 October 2012. Any residential property acquired by any person (including an incorporated company), except that of a Hong Kong (SAR) permanent resident, is subject to BSD. BSD is charged at a flat rate of 15 percent on all residential properties, on top of the existing stamp duty and SSD, if applicable.
The Stamp Duty Ordinance (SDO) provides that a sale or transfer of immovable property from one associated corporate body to another is exempt from stamp duty. Two companies are associated where:
In addition to the 90 percent association test, a number of other conditions need to be satisfied to qualify for stamp duty exemption. There is a claw back rule in cases where the 90 percent association test ceases to be satisfied within 2 years of the date of the transfer.
Purchase of shares
Tax indemnities and warranties
It is not currently possible to obtain a clearance from the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) giving assurance that a potential target company has no arrears of tax or advising whether the company is involved in a tax dispute. As a result, it is common for tax indemnities or warranties to be included in sale and purchase agreements. The extent of the tax indemnities or warranties is subject to negotiation between the seller and the purchaser and it is customary for prospective purchasers to undertake a tax due diligence
review to ascertain the tax position of the target company and to identify potential tax exposures.
Generally, tax losses incurred by a Hong Kong (SAR) taxpayer may be carried forward indefinitely for set-off against the assessable profits earned in subsequent years of assessment. Losses may not be carried back.
There is no group relief in Hong Kong (SAR). Each company is treated as a separate person for tax purposes. Any unused tax losses incurred by the seller company cannot be transferred to the purchasing company on the sale of the business or the assets of the seller company. A sale of shares in the Hong Kong (SAR) company usually does not affect the availability of the tax losses to be carried forward by that company, unless the change in the company’s shareholders is effected for the sole or dominant purpose of using the Hong Kong (SAR) company’s tax losses.
In the context of court-free amalgamations, the IRD’s current position is that pre-amalgamation tax losses sustained in an amalgamating company would be available to offset the profits derived from the ‘same trade or business’ that the amalgamating company previously carried on and is continued by the amalgamated (surviving) company after amalgamation. Further, tax losses brought forward in the amalgamated company can be offset against profits derived from the trade or business succeeded from the amalgamating company, provided the amalgamated company has fulfilled certain conditions, including the financial resources test, trade continuation test and post-entry test.
Crystallization of tax charges
Changes in the shareholding of a Hong Kong (SAR) company do not trigger any tax charges. The impact of changes in shareholding on tax losses is discussed in the preceding paragraph.
Hong Kong (SAR) stamp duty is chargeable on instruments effecting the sale or transfer of Hong Kong (SAR) stock. ‘Hong Kong (SAR) stock’ is defined to include shares in Hong Kong (SAR)-incorporated companies as well as shares in overseas-incorporated Hong Kong (SAR)-listed companies whose transfer of shares has to be registered in Hong Kong (SAR). No stamp duty is payable on allotments of shares, and capital duty was abolished as of 2013.
The current prevailing stamp duty rate is an aggregate amount equal to 0.2 percent (0.1 percent payable each on the buy note and the sell note) on the higher of the actual consideration stated in the relevant instrument or the value of the stock as at the transfer date, plus a fixed duty of HKD5 for stamping the instrument of transfer. For unlisted Hong Kong (SAR) stock, the value is generally determined by reference to the latest accounts of the company whose shares are being transferred. The net assets and liabilities of the company per the latest accounts are used as the starting point, with possible adjustments to reflect the assets’ market value as at the date of transfer.
A specific stamp duty anti-avoidance provision may apply where shares in a target company change hands and an arrangement is made between the parties so that the purchaser is required to refinance, guarantee or otherwise assume liability for the target company’s debt. For example, where A sells shares in the target company to B and, as an integral part of the transaction, A assigns to B the shareholder’s loan due by the target, the money paid by B as consideration for the assignment of the loan is deemed to be part of the consideration for the sale and purchase of the shares.
As with immovable property, the SDO provides that a transfer of shares from one associated corporate body to another is exempt from stamp duty. As noted earlier in the report, two companies are associated where one is the beneficial owner of not less than 90 percent of the issued share capital of the other, or a third company owns not less than 90 percent of the issued share capital of each company. In addition to the 90 percent association test, a number of other conditions need to be satisfied to qualify for this exemption. A clawback rule applies where the 90 percent association test ceases to be satisfied within 2 years from the date of the transfer.
In certain circumstances, a pre-sale dividend may be considered to reduce the value of the company for Hong Kong (SAR) stamp duty purposes.
A person may apply to the CIR for an advance ruling on how any provision of the IRO applies to them or the arrangement specified in the application. An application fee is payable, and limitations apply.
It is not currently possible to obtain a clearance from the IRD giving assurance that a potential target company has no arrears of tax or advising as to whether the company is involved in a tax dispute.
As Hong Kong (SAR) operates a territorial system of taxation, the profits tax rules apply equally to Hong Kong (SAR) incorporated companies carrying on a trade or business in Hong Kong (SAR) and overseas incorporated companies carrying on a trade or business in Hong Kong (SAR) through a branch. The main types of investment vehicles used to carry on business in Hong Kong (SAR) are a Hong Kong (SAR) incorporated company, a branch of a foreign company, a partnership and an unincorporated joint venture. The local registration and administration requirements vary, depending on the form of legal presence used.
The tax rates that apply to a person’s assessable profits to determine their profits tax liability for the 2017/18 year of assessment are as follows:
The Hong Kong (SAR) government has issued draft legislation introducing a two-tiered profits tax regime, which will apply to both corporations and unincorporated business. Under this regime, the tax rate for the first HKD2 million of profits will be reduced to half of the standard profits tax rate (i.e. 8.25 percent for corporations and 7.5 percent for unincorporated businesses). The remaining profits will be taxed at the standard tax rates.
Under an anti-avoidance measure, a ‘group of connected entities’ can only nominate one entity within the group to enjoy the reduced tax rate for a given year of assessment. The two-tier system is expected to have effect from the year of assessment 2018/19 (i.e. periods starting on or after 1 April 2018), subject to enactment by the Legislative Council.
Hong Kong (SAR) has concluded comprehensive tax treaties with the following countries/jurisdictions:
|China (People’s Republic)||Liechtenstein||South Africa|
|Hungary||Mexico||United Arab Emirates|
Negotiations to conclude tax treaties with a number of Hong Kong’s (SAR) trading and investment partners are underway. Hong Kong (SAR) also has non-comprehensive treaties with various countries relating to income derived from the international operation of ships and/or aircraft. Details and dates of tax treaty negotiations are published on the IRD’s website.
For a summary of reduced withholding tax (WHT) rates under Hong Kong’s tax treaties, see the table at the end of this report.
Foreign parent company
From a Hong Kong (SAR) tax perspective, a foreign parent company may choose to make direct inbound investments into Hong Kong (SAR) since dividends paid by a Hong Kong company to a non- resident shareholder are not subject to WHT in Hong Kong (SAR).
Non-resident intermediate holding company
From a Hong Kong (SAR) tax perspective, it may not be necessary to set up a foreign intermediate holding company for inbound investments into Hong Kong (SAR) since dividends paid by a Hong Kong (SAR) company to a non-resident shareholder are not subject to WHT in Hong Kong (SAR).
A foreign purchaser may decide to acquire business assets through a Hong Kong (SAR) branch. For example, it is common for companies incorporated in the British Virgin Islands to be used to carry on business in Hong Kong (SAR). Alternatively, it may be possible for non-Hong Kong (SAR)-sourced income earned through the Hong Kong (SAR) branch to benefit from protection under a tax treaty concluded between the jurisdiction in which the head office is located and the jurisdiction where the relevant income is sourced.
Hong Kong (SAR) does not impose additional taxes on branch profits remitted to an overseas head office. Generally, Hong Kong (SAR)’s profits tax rules apply to foreign persons carrying on business in Hong Kong (SAR) through a branch in the same way that they apply to Hong Kong (SAR)-incorporated entities. There are special rules for ascertaining the assessable profits of a branch and those of certain types of businesses, including ship owners carrying on business in Hong Kong (SAR) and non-resident aircraft owners.
Partners in a general partnership are jointly and severally liable for the debts and obligations incurred by them or on their behalf. A partnership is treated as a chargeable person for profits tax and property tax purposes, so tax is chargeable at the partnership level. Although a partnership is assessed as a separate legal entity for profits tax purposes, the amount of its liability to profits tax is determined by aggregating the tax liabilities of each partner with respect to their share of the assessable profits or losses of the partnership. Therefore, the amount of tax payable on the partnership profits is affected by the tax profiles of the individual partners, that is, whether the partners have losses and whether the partners are corporate entities (such that the profits tax rate of 16.5 percent applies for the 2017/18 year of assessment) or individuals (such that the standard salaries tax rate of 15 percent applies for the 2017/18 year of assessment).
By contrast, a joint venturer is not responsible in law for acts of its co-venturers. A joint venture is not a legal person and is not deemed to be a chargeable person for the purposes of the IRO. In practice, a profits tax return is often issued by the IRD under the name of the joint venture.
Provided that the IRD accepts that the joint venture should not be regarded as a partnership, it is usually sufficient for the profits tax return to be completed and filed on a nil basis. The relevant income and expenses of the joint venture is reported in the joint venturers’ own profits tax returns.
Hong Kong (SAR) does not impose capital taxes on the issue of debt. There are no transaction taxes or other similar charges on the payment or receipt of interest. Some forms of debt may fall within the definition of Hong Kong (SAR) stock for stamp duty purposes.
Deductibility of interest
Generally, for borrowers other than financial institutions, loan interest and related expenditure (e.g. legal fees, procurement fees, stamp duties) are deductible only to the extent that the money is borrowed for the purpose of producing assessable profits of the borrower and one of the following tests is satisfied:
For the first and third tests, the IRO contains provisions to counter sub-participation and back-to-back loan arrangements by which, the IRD asserts, Hong Kong (SAR) taxpayers were previously able to circumvent the conditions in and thwart the legislative intent of these provisions:
In addition to these specific conditions for interest and related borrowing costs, funding costs and related expenses must be properly charged to the profit and loss account in the basis period for the year of assessment and not otherwise be of a capital nature in order to qualify for deduction.
Following the Court of Final Appeal’s decision in Zeta Estates Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue (2007) 2 HKlRD 102, it is now possible for acquirers to achieve debt pushdown by borrowing to replace equity funding with debt funding (e.g.by paying a dividend), where the equity is employed as capital or working capital in a business carried on for the purpose of earning assessable profits.
Withholding tax on debt and methods to reduce or eliminate it
Hong Kong (SAR) does not currently impose WHT on interest paid by persons carrying on a trade, profession or business in Hong Kong (SAR).
Checklist for debt funding
Capital duty on the increase in the authorized share capital of a company formed and registered under the Hong Kong (SAR) Companies Ordinance was abolished as of 1 June 2012.
Hong Kong outbound investors generally do not use hybrid financing because it is relatively easy for non-financial lenders to ensure that any interest income is offshore-sourced.
Hong Kong (SAR) companies need to satisfy the conditions explained in this report’s earlier section on deductibility of interest to be eligible to claim a deduction for amounts payable on hybrid instruments.
There are currently no specific provisions under the IRO that distinguish between equity and debt interests for profits tax purposes. However, the IRD has issued a practice note to address the changes in the accounting presentation of debt and equity instruments as required under Hong Kong Accounting Standards (HKAS) 32 and 39. These accounting standards, issued by the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants in May 2004, are virtually identical to International Accounting Standards (IAS) 32 and 39, issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. These accounting standards deal with the presentation, recognition and measurement of financial instruments.
The IRD takes the view that the legal form, rather than the accounting treatment, should determine the nature of the financial instrument for profits tax purposes. Therefore, if the characterization of the financial instrument as liability or equity for accounting purposes is not consistent with the legal nature of the instrument, it is necessary to take into account other factors, such as:
For example, coupons on mandatory redeemable preference shares are treated as dividends for profits tax purposes and are not as deemed interest, even where the coupons are re-characterized as interest in the profit and loss account for accounting purposes.
Compound financial instruments must be split into their liability and equity components for purposes of HKAS 32. The IRD adheres to the legal form of the compound instrument and treats it for profits tax purposes as a whole. For example, a convertible bond that is required to be split into its equity and debt components in accordance with HKAS 32 is treated as debt for profits tax purposes. The corresponding interest payments are allowed as deductions provided the general and specific conditions for interest deductibility set out in the IRO are met (see this report’s section on debt).
HKAS 39 was replaced by the new accounting standard HKFRS 9 as of 1 January 2018. The IRD has not yet commented on the tax treatment of financial instruments following the implementation of HKFRS 9.
To provide greater certainty, it is possible to obtain an advance ruling from the IRD on the interpretation of statutory provisions in certain circumstances. A ruling may be granted on how any provision of the IRO applies to the applicant or to the arrangement described in the application. A ruling is given only for a seriously contemplated transaction and not for hypothetical transactions or those where the profits tax is due and payable. An advance ruling is not granted once the due date for filing of the relevant year’s profits tax return has passed.
There are currently no specific provisions under the IRO that deal with the tax treatment of discounted securities for profits tax purposes. The IRD takes the view that the legal form, rather than the accounting treatment, should determine the nature of the financial instrument for profits tax purposes (see this report’s section on hybrids). Where the characterization of the discount security for accounting purposes is not consistent with the legal nature of the instrument, it is necessary to take into account other factors, such as the factors noted in the preceding section for characterizing hybrid financial instruments.
Where the legal characterization of the discount on the security is interest, then such amount is deductible, provided the IRO’s general and specific conditions for interest deductibility are met (see deductibility of interest). Where the legal characterization of the discount is not interest, then its deductibility is determined in accordance with Hong Kong (SAR)’s general deductibility rules.
Payments made pursuant to earn-out clauses that result in additional payments or refunds of the purchase price have the same character for tax purposes for the vendor as the initial purchase price. Likewise, payments related to indemnities or warranties that result in an adjustment to the purchase price should have the same character for tax purposes for the vendor as the initial purchase price.
Where interest is payable under the settlement arrangement, such interest is taxable where the recipient carries on business in Hong Kong and where such interest has a source in Hong Kong (SAR). The deductibility of the interest to the payer is governed by the principles discussed earlier (see ‘Deductibility of interest’).
Concerns of the seller
Considerations of the seller can include:
The Hong Kong (SAR) Companies Ordinance prescribes how Hong Kong (SAR) companies may be formed, operated and terminated.
The Companies Ordinance, which was passed by the Hong Kong (SAR) Legislative Council in July 2012 and took effect on 3 March 2014, aims to modernize the law, ensure better regulation, enhance corporate governance and facilitate business.
Under the Companies Ordinance, five types of companies can be formed (compared with eight under the previous ordinance). Unlimited companies without share capital are abolished; companies limited by guarantee, whether private or non-private, are amalgamated and become companies by guarantee; and non-private companies become ‘public companies’. The concept of par value of shares is abolished, and a general court-free procedure based on a solvency test is introduced as an alternative to reduction of capital.
Further, the Companies Ordinance makes available a court- free regime for two types of amalgamations of wholly owned companies within the same group:
The Companies Ordinance makes no mention of the tax implications of a court-free amalgamation. Pending the decision to amend provisions in the IRO to specifically address the tax treatment of court-free amalgamations, on 16 December 2016, the IRD published guidance on its website clarifying its approach when making assessments on the profits tax consequences of a court-free amalgamation, for example, in relation to the availability of unutilized tax losses of the amalgamating companies (see ‘Tax losses’ above).
All Hong Kong (SAR) companies, other than certain dormant companies, must compile accounts annually and have them audited by a registered Hong Kong (SAR) auditor. However, Hong Kong (SAR) private companies do not have an obligation to file financial statements with the Hong Kong (SAR) Companies registry or otherwise make them publicly available.
The Companies Ordinance only permits the payment of dividends from distributable profits. A company’s profits available for distribution are its accumulated realized profits (not previously used by distribution or capitalization), less its accumulated realized losses (not previously written-off in a reduction or reorganization of capital). The assessment of available profit and declaration of dividends is determined separately for each legal entity, not on the consolidated position. This entity-by-entity assessment requires planning to avoid dividend traps — the inability to stream profits to the ultimate shareholder — because of insufficient profits within a chain of companies. Appropriate pre-acquisition structuring should help to minimize this risk.
A Hong Kong (SAR) company may undergo a court-free share capital reduction if approved by a special resolution supported by a solvency statement based on a uniform solvency test.
There is no concept of grouping for tax purposes in Hong Kong (SAR). All companies are assessed separately, irrespective of whether they are group, associated or related companies.
Hong Kong (SAR)’s transfer pricing provisions in the domestic law are brief and address transactions between a resident and a closely connected non-resident. Due to practical difficulties, in the past, these provisions were not commonly applied other than in blatant avoidance cases. Rather, where the IRD encounters non-arm’s length pricing, it usually sought to address the situation by adjusting deduction claims or applying the general anti-avoidance provision.
However, the tax and transfer pricing landscape in Hong Kong (SAR) is maturing rapidly, showing signs of keeping up with the advancing transfer pricing recommendations issued by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) with the issuance of Departmental Interpretation and Practice Note No. 46 (DIPN-46) by the IRD. The recent change in the transfer pricing environment makes it clear that the IRD is adopting and enforcing transfer pricing principles in tax audits.
According to Hong Kong (SAR) transfer pricing guidelines (i.e. DIPN 46), taxpayers are encouraged to prepare transfer pricing documentation to support the reasonableness of their transfer pricing policy. Although the preparation of a transfer pricing report is not mandatory in Hong Kong, the IRD recently launched a large number of tax audits against multinationals of different industries, and, in various cases, challenged transfer pricing methodologies. International companies have come under considerable scrutiny, particularly regarding management service fees and head office charges, including investigations on whether service charges can be supported. The level of details and sophistication of information requested in relation to allocation recharges from the head office and service companies is elevating transfer pricing to a new level in Hong Kong (SAR). This includes scrutiny regarding the benefits test, duplication and support for mark-ups.
Regarding the OECD’s BEPS Action Plan, the Hong Kong (SAR) government has introduced draft legislation for mandatory transfer pricing reporting and anti-BEPS measures in Hong Kong (SAR). The bill was gazetted on 29 December 2017. In line with many OECD jurisdictions, the transfer pricing legislation would broadly:
Hong Kong (SAR) constituent entities of a group would be required to prepare master and local files for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2018. Reportable groups would be required to file country-by-country reports for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018.
Based on the tax treaties that Hong Kong (SAR) has concluded to date, a company is generally a resident of Hong Kong (SAR) if it is incorporated in Hong Kong (SAR) or normally managed or controlled in Hong Kong (SAR). Cases of dual residency are resolved either by reference to the company’s place of effective management or by mutual agreement.
Foreign investments of a local target company
As explained in this report’s section on local holding companies, Hong Kong (SAR) companies are not subject to profits tax on dividends received from overseas companies. Similarly, any profit derived from selling shares in the overseas company is not subject to profits tax where the shares in the overseas company are capital assets of the Hong Kong (SAR) seller, or where the profit is derived from outside Hong Kong (SAR). It is relatively easy for non-financial institutions to make loans of money in a way that ensures any interest income is offshore-sourced.
Hong Kong (SAR) has no controlled foreign company rules.
Advantages of asset purchases
Disadvantages of asset purchases
Advantages of share purchases
Disadvantages of share purchases
8th Floor, Prince’s Building 10 Chater Road
Central Hong Kong
T: +852 2826 7166
8th Floor, Prince’s Building 10 Chater Road
Central Hong Kong
T: +852 2143 8709