France: Criteria for finding permanent establishment | KPMG | GLOBAL

France: Court decision, criteria for finding permanent establishment

France: Criteria for finding permanent establishment

The Paris Administrative Court of Appeal (Cour administrative d'appel) issued a decision that affirms the criteria to be used by the French courts to find the presence of a permanent establishment.


Related content

The case identifying information is:  Sté Valueclick Ltd., n° 17PA01538 (CAA Paris, 9e ch., 1 March 2018)


At issue was whether actions by employees in France were sufficient to give rise to a permanent establishment (PE) of an Irish company in France.

In evaluating the presence of a PE of the Irish company in France, the appeals court evaluated whether:

  • French employees of the Irish company negotiated the terms of contracts and were involved in drafting certain contractual clauses with the customers.
  • The Irish managers automatically signed the contracts and whether this action corresponded to a simple validation of the contracts negotiated and drawn up by the managers and employees in France.
  • The advertising programs were developed and monitored by employees in France.
  • The French company’s employees acted towards third parties as employees of the Irish company.
  • Customers and publishers confused the Irish and French companies.

The court concluded that none of these factors established that the employees in France had been authorized to act on behalf of and in the name of the Irish company. 

KPMG observation

Tax professionals with Fidal* have observed that in the instant case, the Paris Administrative Court of Appeal generally followed prior case law from a July 2017 decision of the Paris Administrative Court—a case that presented similar facts and reflected similar arguments being by the tax authorities. Read TaxNewsFlash-Europe

As in that July 2017 case, the appeals court in the March 2018 case found whether the contracts could come into effect and whether the services could be rendered without prior approval and prior validation of the contracts by the Irish entity were critical elements.

The recent decision is being viewed by some tax professionals as weakening the position of the French tax administration which, for some six to seven years, has relied on the concept of permanent establishment as “a weapon of mass taxation” in making foreign e-commerce entities (both big and small) subject to tax in France. 

As with the July 2017 case, the appeals court in March 2018 adopted a two-part reasoning: 

  • First, the contract between the French company and the Irish company did not authorize the French company to commit its principal contractually.
  • Second, the facts raised by the court did not make it possible to question this lack of authority because the services could not be rendered by the Irish company until the customer contract had been approved by the Irish company.

The Paris Administrative Court of Appeal—like the Paris Administrative Court in last July’s decision—continues to apply the principles adopted by the Conseil d’Etat (France’s highest administrative court) in the Zimmer decision in 2010.


For more information, contact a tax professional with Fidal* in France:

Laurence Mazevet | +33 1 55 68 15 35 |

* Fidal is a French law firm that is independent from KPMG and its member firms.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us


Request for proposal