This report covers new U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services policy requiring, amongst other things, corroborating evidence that the work to be performed by the beneficiary at a third-party location will be in a specialty occupation.
On February 22, 2018, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) published a policy memorandum entitled "Contracts and Itineraries Requirements for H-1B Petitions Involving Third-Party Worksites.”1 The guidelines set out in the policy memorandum took effect immediately.
Petitioners may now be required to submit more comprehensive and detailed documentation in support of an H-1B petition filed for an employee who will work at a third-party work location. The updated policy regarding third-party placement of H-1B employees will apply to FY 2019 H-1B cap petitions and H-1B extension as well as amendment requests.
The petitioner of an H-1B filing involving a third-party placement must establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, the following:
The USCIS has concluded that employer violations are more likely to occur at third-party worksites. As a counter-measure, the new policy requires corroborating evidence that the work to be performed by the beneficiary at a third-party location will be in a specialty occupation. Further, the new guidelines require corroborating evidence that an employer-employee relationship will be maintained by the petitioner throughout the entire period of H-1B employment, including any periods during which the beneficiary will be deployed to a third-party location.
The policy memorandum released on February 22, 2018, indicates that petitioners often provide uncorroborated statements describing the role that an H-1B beneficiary will perform at a third-party work location. The USCIS memo explains that such statements alone are often insufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the H-1B beneficiary will actually perform specialty occupation work. In addition to copies of contracts between the petitioner and the end-client relating to the particular work location(s) to which the H-1B employee will be deployed, the USCIS policy memorandum lists the following items as acceptable corroborating evidence:
According to the updated policy, the USCIS will be better able to determine whether the requisite employer-employee relationship exists and/or will exist by evaluating the chain of contracts and/or legal agreements between the petitioner and the ultimate end-client.
Although a petitioner may redact confidential information in the documents submitted in support of an H-1B petition filed per the new guidelines, the evidence sent to the USCIS must be sufficiently comprehensive and detailed for the agency to determine whether the intended offsite placement meets H-1B criteria.
The regulatory requirement that an employer must submit an itinerary with a petition for an H-1B employee who will work in more than one (1) location is longstanding. The policy memorandum published by USCIS on February 22, 2018, acknowledges that the regulation only requires an itinerary to contain the dates and locations associated with the services to be provided, however, it states that a more detailed itinerary may assist in demonstrating specific and non-speculative qualifying assignments. As per the USCIS, helpful information that may be included in a complete itinerary of services or engagements is as follows:
While an H-1B petition may be approved for up to three (3) years, the USCIS, in its discretionary application of the new policy guidelines, will generally limit the approval period to the length of time the petitioner can demonstrate that: 1) the beneficiary will perform non-speculative work in a specialty occupation, and 2) the requisite employer-employee relationship will be maintained with the beneficiary, as documented by contracts, statements of work, and other similar types of evidence.
IMPLICATIONS FOR H1-B EXTENSIONS
The updated policy makes clear that the USCIS will apply increased scrutiny to H-1B extension requests. More specifically, the new policy guidelines indicate that the petitioner should establish that the H-1B requirements for third-party placement were met during the entire course of previous employment with the organization. This requires the petitioner to establish that the beneficiary was employed in a specialty occupation and paid the required wage during the relevant H-1B employment period.
In addition, the petitioner must provide evidence that it maintained the right to control the beneficiary’s employment at all relevant times. If the USCIS finds that the petitioner has been non-compliant with H-1B requirements by failing to comply with the terms and conditions of the original petition and/or not filing a timely amended petition, then the USCIS may call into question the eligibility of any subsequent petitions filed to extend the beneficiary’s employment.
1 To access “Contracts and Itineraries Requirements for H-1B Petitions Involving Third-Party Worksites,” February 22, 2018, PM-602-0157, click here (PDF 119 KB).
* Please note that KPMG LLP (U.S.) does not provide any immigration services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Canada.
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
Flash Alert is an Global Mobility Services publication of KPMG LLPs Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.