This report covers new efforts by the French government to crack down on illegal and non-compliant practices involving foreign labor in France.
On 12 February 2018, the Labor Minister, Muriel Pénicaud, presented to the press 16 measures to further combat illegal work in France.1 Some of the measures include increased financial penalties, widespread publication of the sanctions for illegal work, extension of the prefects’ powers to order the closure or cessation of activities of companies concerned, and reinforcement of the labor inspectors’ investigative powers.
Employers with foreign workers/posted workers will need to tighten up their hiring practices and take steps to act in full compliance with existing laws2. In addition, they should familiarize themselves with the proposed 16 measures announced by the minister of labor. Employers can expect increased audits and face the prospect, if irregularities are discovered, of financial penalties.
Employers seconding employees to France may have to adjust their procedures and practices in light of the proposals.
At the European level, secondment is covered by a European Union Directive of 19963, which was the subject of an amendment announced in October 2017 by the Council of Ministers of Labor.4 The member states’ ministers of labor reached a compromise and the text is currently being discussed at the European Parliament and the Commission.
As noted above, on 12 February 2018, France’s minister of labor presented 16 measures to combat illegal work, including increased financial penalties for companies.
On 7 March, the Council of Ministers will adopt an order that will increase the financial penalties from €2,000 to €3,000 per employee illegally employed and from €4,000 to €6,000, in the case of repeated offenses.5 In addition, if a foreign provider does not pay the fine, its services may be suspended.
The plan to strengthen the prefects’ sanctioning powers and labor inspectors’ investigative powers are also very significant steps. The government intends to extend the powers of prefects to close an establishment or order the cessation of a company’s activity. It also wants the labor inspection officers to have easier access to the information they might need to be able to cross-check the information they have obtained with that of other authorities, such as social security institutions.
1 See the Press Dossier (in French) “Bilan et Mesures du Plan National de Lutte contre le Travail Illégal“ on the Web site for the Ministère du Travail (Labor Ministry).
To see the minister’s RMC-BFMTV interview on 12 February 2018 (in French), click here. (Please note that this is a 3rd party (non-governmental, non-KPMG, non-FIDAL) website. Provision of this URL does not represent an endorsement by KPMG International or Fidal.)
This was also, reported by J-B. Duval, ““Travailleurs détachés: Muriel Pénicaud annonce le "name and shame" contre les entreprises condamnées pour travail illégal,” in Huffington Post (online), 12 févriery 2018.
2 “Employment Law,” Law No. 2016-1088 relating to work, modernization of social dialogue and securing career paths. Article 1262-1 of the French Labor Code on secondment situations.
3 Directive 96/71 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996.
4 See the webpage “Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council, 23/10/2017,” for further details. For an announcement of the endorsement of the amendment by the ministers of labor in October 2017, click here. In addition, see the French government’s 24 October 2017 press release “Posted Workers: an Ambitious Agreement Reached.” Also, to see the Interinstitutional File: 2016/0070 from the Council of the European Union (24 October 2017), click here (PDF 388 KB).
5 See (in French) pages 16-17 of “Dossier de Presse (PDF 846 KB): Bilan et Mesures du Plan National de Lutte contre le Travail Illégal,” (12 février 2018).
* Please note the KPMG International member firm in the United States does not provide immigration or labour law services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by FIDAL Direction Internationale in France.
<p>© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.</p> <p>KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.</p>
Flash Alert is an Global Mobility Services publication of KPMG LLPs Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.