The U.S. Tax Court today issued an opinion holding that Mexican taxes paid by the U.S. taxpayer’s Mexican licensee for 2007-2009 were “compulsory levies” for which the U.S. taxpayer was entitled to claim foreign tax credits under section 901(a).
The case is: The Coca-Cola Co. v. Commissioner, 149 T.C. No. 21 (December 14, 2017). Read the Tax Court’s 32-page opinion [PDF 121 KB]
The taxpayer is a U.S. corporation doing business in Mexico through a branch (licensee). For tax years 2007-2009, the licensee paid royalties to the taxpayer for the use of the taxpayer’s intangible property, and the licensee claimed deductions for these royalties on its Mexican corporate income tax returns. The taxpayer reported all of the licensee’s income on its U.S. consolidated federal income tax returns, and claimed foreign tax credits under section 901 for the corporate income taxes that the licensee had paid to Mexico.
The IRS examined the taxpayer’s 2007-2009 returns, and determined substantial deficiencies as a result of transfer pricing adjustments under section 482. The IRS found that the royalties that the licensee had paid to the taxpayer were not at arm’s length. A related finding by the IRS was that the licensee had claimed insufficient deductions for royalty payments on its Mexican tax returns and, to that extent, had overpaid its Mexican corporate income tax. The IRS found that, to the extent of the overpaid Mexican corporate income tax, the taxes paid to Mexico were not “compulsory” and were as such not “taxes.”
The taxpayer filed a motion for partial summary judgment with respect its claim for foreign tax credits. The transfer pricing issues are not part of this action and are pending adjudication.
The Tax Court concluded that the Mexican taxes paid by the licensee were “compulsory” levies for which the taxpayer was entitled to claim foreign tax credits under section 901(a). The court observed that:
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.