European regulator highlights priorities for 2017 IFRS financial statements
The European regulator, ESMA1, has issued a statement (PDF 288 KB) highlighting the common areas that European national securities regulators will be focusing on when reviewing listed companies’ 2017 financial statements to promote the consistent application of IFRS. Not surprisingly, disclosures of the impact of implementing the new standards are one of its three key priorities.
In a matter of weeks, the new financial instruments and revenue standards will become effective. ESMA expects issuers to provide relevant entity-specific qualitative and quantitative information about the impact of these new standards.
Partner, KPMG International Standards Group
Although the topics included in the statement are those deemed to be most relevant at a European level, regulatory bodies outside Europe are also likely to pay particular attention to many of the same topics. These topics are not exhaustive, however, and national regulators may have additional areas of focus.
For 2017 IFRS financial statements, ESMA expects high-quality, entity-specific, qualitative and quantitative disclosures on the impacts of the new standards – IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, IFRS 15 Revenue From Contracts with Customers and IFRS 16 Leases.
During 2016, ESMA outlined its expectations for disclosures on the implementation of IFRSs 9 and 152. ESMA’s recent fact-finding exercise found mostly qualitative disclosures in 2016 annual financial statements and 2017 interim financial statements.
Given the new standards will already be effective when 2017 annuals are published, ESMA is expecting companies to have substantially completed their implementation analyses and is therefore expecting more quantitative disclosures in 2017 annual financial statements.
In addition to disclosures on the impact of the new standards, ESMA has identified specific issues relating to IFRS 3 Business Combinations and IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows as key focus areas.
|Topics||Specific points to consider|
|Disclosures on the impact of new standards||
|IFRS 3 recognition, measurement and disclosure issues||
|IAS 7 disclosure issues||
In addition, ESMA is reminding issuers preparing their 2017 annual reports of the need for a fair, balanced and comprehensive analysis of the development and performance of the business in their management report.
Also, with issuers applying the requirements of the amended EU Accounting Directive (as transposed into national law) for the first time, ESMA is:
ESMA also continues to focus on Brexit-related disclosures. The regulator expects disclosure in the financial statements or in the management report of the risks associated with Brexit by issuers potentially affected, including expected impacts and uncertainties, on their business activities – e.g. uncertainties about income taxes in the financial statements. Visit KPMG’s Brexit homepage to find out more about the impacts on your business.
Listed companies and their auditors should continue to pay attention to the other enforcement priorities previously published by ESMA, which remain relevant. In particular, the transparent presentation of financial performance, both in financial statements – following the requirements set out in the amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements – and in other sections of the annual report where ESMA’s guidelines on alternative performance measures apply4.
Download our web article as a PDF handout (PDF 248 KB).
1 European Securities and Markets Authority
3 See ESMA’s 2014 report on applying IFRS 3 (PDF 751 KB)
4 See also ESMA’s Q&A on alternative performance measures guidelines
© 2018 KPMG IFRG Limited is a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG IFRG Limited, registered in England No 5253019. Registered office: 15 Canada Square, London, E14 5GL, UK.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.