The 2017 Draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill in South Africa proposes to repeal the private-sector foreign employment income tax exemption as of March 1, 2019, which could result in increased tax costs for assignees, making adjustments to gross-up packages and withholding taxes necessary.
The 2017 Draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill, dated 19 July 2017, proposes to repeal the private-sector foreign employment income tax exemption for South African residents as of 1 March 2019.
This proposed change is described below.
For assignments to South Africa in which assignees are subject to South African taxation, and for assignees working outside South Africa but still subject to South African taxation, international assignment cost projections and budgeting should reflect the draft changes described in this newsletter if and when they come into effect. Where appropriate, adjustments to gross-up packages and withholding taxes need to be considered.
South African tax residents are taxed on their worldwide income under the residence-based system of taxation. Whilst double taxation treaties (DTAs) exist to prevent double taxation under certain circumstances, specific provisions in the South African tax legislation provide pre-emptive exemptions, e.g. an exemption that limits a country’s taxing rights statutorily based on certain criteria.
Many South African tax residents work abroad for a period during their working life. At present, section 10(1)(o)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, No. 58 of 1962 (ITA) exempts employment income received by a South African tax resident during any year of assessment for services rendered outside South Africa for or on behalf of any employer, if that individual was outside South Africa for:
The exemption is only available to employees of private-sector companies.
There is currently no requirement that tax be payable in another country for this exemption to apply. As a result, it is possible that under certain circumstances, no income tax will be paid anywhere by South African tax residents, for periods worked outside of South Africa.
Furthermore, because there is no requirement that tax be payable in another country for this exemption to apply, individuals often do not have to rely on DTAs or make use of the tax credit system to avoid double taxation.
According to National Treasury, the exemption for private-sector foreign employment income from the South African tax net appears excessively generous, particularly in instances where the individual worked in a foreign country with a low or zero personal income tax rate. National Treasury is of the view that the current exemption creates opportunities for double non-taxation and unequal tax treatment for South African residents employed by a national, provincial or local sphere of government or any public or municipal entity, who thus do not qualify for the exemption.
It is proposed that the exemption be repealed, resulting in all South African tax residents being subject to tax on foreign employment income earned for services rendered outside South Africa with relief from foreign taxes paid on the income under section 6quat of the ITA.
The effective date of the proposed amendment is 1 March 2019 and applies to years of assessment commencing on or after that date.
Outside of pre-emptive exemptions, relief from double taxation is currently available to individuals who:
(a) rely on a DTA to seek relief from having to pay tax in South Africa on certain foreign- sourced income; or
(b) claim foreign tax credits (under section 6quat of the ITA) for taxes already paid in the foreign country relating to the foreign-sourced income.
The application of a DTA is fairly complex and often requires an individual to seek tax advice. If there is no DTA between South Africa and a particular foreign country or the DTA does not provide exclusive taxing rights, the individual will have to rely on claiming foreign tax credits to prevent double taxation. The ITA section 6quat rebate is limited to the amount of tax the individual would have paid had the income been earned in South Africa.
Individuals claiming relief through the use of foreign tax credits can only do so when they submit their own tax returns. Until that point, the individual must still pay all taxes due in both affected countries. It is evident that without an administrative intervention, a cash flow problem could occur when tax is due and payable on a monthly basis in the foreign country. A further complication is the difficulty in providing sufficient proof of foreign taxes paid. Certain self-assessment taxes do not require assessment from the revenue authorities and the only proof that the individual would have of taxes paid would be a foreign tax return. In addition, tax years that are not aligned cause complexity in calculating the credits available.
The proposal has the potential to result in a tax withholding of up to 90% of taxable income in certain circumstances. Clearly, this would be a harsh result.
While certain proposals mentioned in the Budget 2017 are in the process of being enacted, there is still an extensive legislative process before any changes are made to the tax exemption for foreign service income.
KPMG in its own name, and in conjunction with industry bodies, will engage with National Treasury and the Parliamentary committees as part of the legislative process. We would welcome any discussions on the effect of this proposal on clients.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in South Africa.
© 2017 KPMG Services Proprietary Limited, a South African company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Flash Alert is an Global Mobility Services publication of KPMG LLPs Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.