The U.S. Court of International Trade today granted the government’s motion to dismiss, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, a challenge of a ruling issued by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The importer requested a pre-importation review of CBP’s ruling. The trade court, however, found that the importer had failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that it faced business disruption, irrecoverable financial loss, and reputational harm absent a pre-importation review of CBP’s ruling.
The case is: Cannakorp, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 17-83 (CIT July 11, 2017). Read the trade court’s opinion.
The importer in April 2016 requested a pre-importation ruling from CBP regarding its “single-use, pod-based cannabis vaporizer system.” The importer sought to establish that the product was lawful under an exemption to the U.S. Controlled Substances Act.
In March 2017, CBP issued a ruling that the product was not exempt from the prohibition on the importation of drug paraphernalia and could not be legally imported into the United States.
The importer filed a complaint with the trade court, asserting (among other claims) that without a pre-importation review, it would experience “irreparable harm” and requested that the court declare CBP’s ruling was unlawful. The government filed a motion to dismiss. The government asserted that the importer had failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that it would suffer irreparable harm absent a pre-importation judicial review.
Today, the trade court granted the government’s motion to dismiss.
In this opinion, the court set out the legal framework for what constitutes irreparable harm, and acknowledged that as a start-up business, the importer may believe that it was in a “Catch-22” situation (that it was unable to establish the economic harm caused by CBP’s ruling because the ruling prevented the importer from getting off the ground and establishing evidence of its viability).
The trade court examined the elements of the importer’s claims—that it faced actual, imminent harm—but the court concluded that the importer had failed to show the required factors of business disruption, irrecoverable financial loss, and reputational harm necessary to support its claim of irreparable harm beyond “vague, to inconsistent, to contradictory” arguments.
For more information, contact a professional with KPMG’s Trade & Customs practice:
Douglas Zuvich | +1 (312) 665-1022 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Andrew Siciliano | +1 (631) 425-6057 | email@example.com
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.