This report covers the July 13, 2017 decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii concerning President Trump’s travel ban Executive Order.
On July 13, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, modified1 the preliminary injunction that had previously been narrowed by the U.S. Supreme Court to prevent the government from enforcing the president’s Executive Order2 banning entry to the United States by individuals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. (For prior coverage, see GMS Flash Alert 2017-114, June 30, 2017.)
It is very important that nationals from Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Iran, and Yemen and their immigration counsel and global mobility managers (if applicable) understand how the decision from the U.S. District Court alters the application of the Executive Order as concerns close family members, because who constitutes a close family member has expanded and the ability of the newly expanded categories of “close family members” to enter and leave the United States could be impacted.
The individuals from these countries who have a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States were — with some notable exceptions — allowed by the Supreme Court to enter the United States; in other words, they are to remain exempt from the Executive Order’s 90-day travel ban.
The U.S. District Court effectively overturned the Department of State and Department of Homeland Security FAQs3 and concluded that the travel ban cannot be enforced against:
The above had been previously prohibited from entering the United States.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement that the Justice Department will appeal the July 13 decision by U.S. District Judge Derrick K. Watson.4
Individuals affected by the Court’s revision to the terms of application of the Executive Order should consult as soon as possible with their qualified immigration counsel to ascertain their status and the rights of family members, as well as appropriate next steps in light of the new rules and the Court’s July 13 decision.
As always, KPMG Law LLP will endeavor to provide updates regarding the implementation of the Executive Order as information becomes available.
1. For the Judge’s decisions in State of Hawaii (PDF 2.3 MB), et al. v. Trump, et al.; Civil No. 17-00050 DKW-KSC (July 13, 2017), click here.
2. Executive Order 13780 entitled "Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Entry into the United States" that was signed by President Trump on March 6, 2017.
3. For “Frequently Asked Questions on Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States,” click here.
4. To see the July 14, 2017 Department of Justice press release, click here.
* Please note that KPMG LLP (U.S.) does not provide any immigration services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Canada.
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a Canada limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
Flash Alert is an Global Mobility Services publication of KPMG LLPs Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.