This report covers the Belgian tax authorities change to a rule that had caused the loss of the tax-free allowance tied to married, legally cohabiting taxpayers with dependent children when a spouse enjoyed foreign-source employment income that is exempted in Belgium.
With the publication of Circular Letter of 18 May 2017 (2017/C/31), Belgian tax authorities put an end to the discriminatory treatment of married and legally cohabitating taxpayers with dependent children, as opposed to those who are single or not legally cohabiting, in situations where the spouse with the higher employment income has income that is exempted from taxation in Belgium.1
The surcharges on the tax-free allowances referred to in article 132 of the Belgian Income Tax Code (for example, the surcharge for dependent children) were automatically allocated to the spouse with the higher income. When this spouse enjoyed foreign-source employment income that is exempted in Belgium, some or all of the allowance was lost.
However, in contrast, individuals not legally cohabitating or single taxpayers can freely choose to which partner the surcharge on the tax-free allowance for their dependent children applies.
To end this discrimination embodied in the tax code, as from the 2017 assessment year and in cases of a joint assessment, the surcharges on the tax-free allowance will be allocated to the spouse with the higher income unless allocation to the other spouse would be more beneficial for both taxpayers -- the calculation that is most beneficial for the taxpayers will be selected. The new rule will be applied regardless of whether the taxpayer has enjoyed a benefit abroad.
This could have important consequences for taxpayers having dependent children who have been filing joint returns for assessments levied from 1 January 2012.
Various courts had ruled that the original provision was discriminatory and counter to the free movement of persons (a core European Union principle) and Belgium had been asked to amend its legislation.2
The administrative solution previously developed by the Belgian tax administration, whereby an additional tax reduction was granted under certain conditions, was rejected by a Court of Appeal of Antwerp in a judgment of 22 September 2015.3
In anticipation of a change in legislation, the Belgian tax administration will adjust the tax calculation program for the 2017 assessment year (2016 income year).
Starting with the 2017 assessment year and in cases of joint assessment, the surcharges on the tax-free allowance will be allocated to the spouse with the higher income unless allocation to the other spouse would be more beneficial for both taxpayers.
In practice, two calculations will be made:
This double calculation is applicable in case:
The calculation that is most beneficial for the taxpayers will be selected.4 It does not matter whether the taxpayer has enjoyed a benefit abroad (e.g., in the host country, an allowance for dependent children), whether fiscal or of another nature.
The Belgian Ministry of Finance confirmed that the provisions of the Circular Letter also apply to internal officials working in Belgium for organizations for which “Headquarter Agreements” have been concluded with Belgium.
The adjustment also applies for the previous assessment years in which taxpayers were in the same situation.
The publication of the judgments5 of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the Constitutional Court provides grounds for taxpayers to file appeals6 (within six months) or request a rectification ex officio7. The latter will allow the taxpayer to go back five years.
In practice, this implies that the taxpayer can request a rectification ex officio for assessments levied from 1 January 2012, provided the assessment was not already the object of a protest that gave rise to a final decision.
As a result of this Circular, taxpayers having dependent children and who have been filing joint returns for tax years going back to 2012, in which one or both spouses has exempt income, should review the tax assessments received to determine whether they may qualify for this concession and if they find that they do, file for a rectification ex officio.
1 Under application of article 155 or 156 of the Belgian Income Tax Code.
2 Judgment of 12.12.2013 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (C-303/12, Imfeld and Garcet) and the judgment of 24.04.2014 of the Constitutional Court (No. 68/2014).
3 Court of Appeal of Antwerp, 22 September 2015, case 2013/AR/2818.
4 Article 134, §4, 2° of the Belgian Income Tax Code.
5 Judgment of 12.12.2013 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (C-303/12, Imfeld and Garcet) and the judgment of 24.04.2014 of the Constitutional Court (No. 68/2014).
6 Article 371 of the Belgian Income Tax Code.
7 Article 376, §1 of the Belgian Income Tax Code.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Belgium.
© 2017 KPMG Tax and Legal Advisers, a Belgian Civil Cooperative Company with Limited Liability (burg. CVBA/SCRL civile) and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
Flash Alert is an Global Mobility Services publication of KPMG LLPs Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.