The U.S. Tax Court today—in a case of “first impression” concerning application of section 267(a) to S corporation employers and ESOP participants—concluded that an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) formed by an S corporation and the ESOP-participating employees are “related persons” for purposes of section 267. As such, the court held that deductions for accrued but unpaid payroll expense must be deferred until the pay was received by the employees and includible in their gross income.
The case is: Petersen v. Commissioner, 148 T.C. No. 22 (June 13, 2017). Read the Tax Court opinion [PDF 115 KB]
Section 267 disallows or defers deductions for certain losses and expenses incurred in transactions between related persons. Specifically, section 267(a)(2) provides that if a taxpayer makes a deductible payment to a “related person,” that payment is not allowable as a deduction to the payor until it is includible in the gross income of the payee.
Section 267(e) provides that in the case of an S corporation, “any person who owns (directly or indirectly) any stock of such corporation” is treated as a related person. In addition, section 267(c) provides that stock owned by a trust is constructively owned by the beneficiaries of the trust.
The taxpayers were founders and owners of an S corporation. During 2009 and 2010, the S corporation maintained an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) for its employees that owned some of all of the stock of the S corporation. Also in 2009 and 2010, the S corporation accrued expenses for wages, vacation pay, and other payroll items on behalf of its employees. Some of these accrued payroll expenses were not paid until the next year.
The IRS asserted that the ESOP trust was a “trust” within the meaning of section 267(c)(1), such that the trust beneficiaries—the S corporation employees who were ESOP participants—were deemed to be “related persons” for purposes of section 267(b).
The Tax Court determined that the entity holding the S stock for the benefit of the ESOP-participating employees was a trust within the meaning of section 267(c) and that the stock held by the trust was deemed owned by its beneficiaries. As a result, the S corporation and the ESOP-participating employees were “related persons,” and the S corporation’s deduction for accrued but unpaid payroll expenses was to be deferred until such payments were includible in the income of the ESOP-participating employees.
Concerning the penalty assessment, the Tax Court found that the taxpayers made a good-faith effort to assess their tax liabilities properly and were not liable for any accuracy-related penalty.
<p>© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.</p> <p>KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.</p>
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.