Dan Hodgson and Hayley Lock examine the ATO's new draft ruling regarding employee travel expenses.
Yesterday, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) released Draft TR 2017/D6
Nothing like a nice meaty and universally applicable tax ruling to end the financial year with!
The draft ruling consolidates and updates a plethora of former ATO guidance for recent Court decisions, such as the John Holland case (John Holland Group Pty Ltd & Anor v FCT 2015 ATC 20-510), and contemporary work practices such as fly-in-fly-out (FIFO) and working from home arrangements.
The ATO bifurcates the analysis of deductibility between transport and other travel costs outlining four key considerations under each. See the table below.
|Transport expenses||Accommodation, meal and incidental expenses|
Other points of note include:
While still lengthy, the ruling is well-drafted and the simplified language and structural format reflects a welcome improvement on previous rulings.
Almost all employers will have some form of staff travel expenditure. It will be critical to consider the implications of the draft ruling for your business in the context of the profile of your mobile population.
The ATO is accepting submissions. Please contact us if you would like to provide feedback on this draft ruling.
<p>© 2018 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.</p> <p>KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.</p>