This report focuses on the approaches of the U.K. government and the EU Commission to the status of EU nationals in the U.K. and British nationals in the EU as negotiations on Brexit proceed.
On 26 June 2017, the government of the U.K. published its policy paper on the status of existing European Union (EU) migrants in the U.K. post-Brexit.1 This follows the European Commission’s publication of a working paper on the same subject on 24 May 2017.2 These opening positions will form the basis of continuing negotiation between the U.K. and EU. Unless no agreement is reached, EU nationals in the U.K. and British nationals in other EU states may see their status ending up being somewhere between these two positions.
The GMS Flash Alert reports on the EU’s and U.K.’s respective positions on how existing EU migrants will be impacted by Brexit.
Since the U.K. referendum vote on 23 June 20163, migrants relying on the EU’s principle of free movement of people within the EU have been nervous about what they will be able to do as the U.K. prepares to leave the EU and once Brexit actually occurs (presumably in March 2019). Businesses have been left to plan as best they can amidst an atmosphere of uncertainty.
The publication of approaches by both negotiating parties provides some key parameters that indicate where negotiations might end up in an agreement concluded between the U.K. and the EU. Employers and individuals may wish therefore to take further steps to plan for the future.
The EU proposes life-long enforceable rights of residence and benefits for anyone (and their families) who reside or have resided in their host EU country before the U.K. withdrawal date. In order to identify those who have rights of free movement, EU citizens could apply for documents proving their right to be in the United Kingdom. These documents would be available free of charge or at the same cost as a similar document provided to nationals of the host country (e.g., the cost of a passport).
The U.K. policy paper suggests that after the withdrawal date, all EU migrants will need to make applications to evidence a new right of residence. However, in order to avoid a surge of new EU migrants before the withdrawal date, it proposes a different cut-off date by which EU migrants will have had to be resident to qualify for residence in the U.K. post-Brexit. This cut-off date will be no earlier than 29 March 2017, which is when the U.K. triggered Article 50, starting the formal process of leaving the EU.
After the withdrawal date, migrants will have a two-year “grace period” in which to make applications to establish their status in U.K. law. There will also be a new voluntary scheme before the withdrawal date so that these applications can be made earlier. Those who qualify for permanent residence (normally by having resided for five continuous years) will have to apply for “settled status.” There will be a simplified process for anyone who already has a document certifying permanent residence. People who do not qualify for permanent residence by the end of the grace period will need to apply for temporary residence, under rules which are not yet set out.
Migrants who came to the U.K. after the cut-off date should not assume they may ultimately qualify for permanent residence. Indeed the concept of permanent residence will no longer exist – rather, it will be “indefinite leave to remain.”
The policy paper also proposes to relax the requirement for students and self-sufficient people to have had comprehensive sickness insurance for their time in these categories to count towards permanent residence. Non-EU national family members of EU migrants who reside in the U.K. before the withdrawal date will qualify under the existing EU rules. Those who come after the withdrawal date will need to qualify under the much stricter U.K. rules.
Anyone who qualifies under these rules will be able to live, work, and study in the U.K., and have access to public services as British nationals do.
A number of points are not dealt with in the proposal:
Both the U.K. and EU proposals assume that free movement of people between the EU and U.K. will end after the U.K. leaves the EU. Neither sets out a plan for future immigration rules for new EU migrants to the U.K. or British migrants to the EU. These will form part of the wider Brexit negotiations and new bilateral arrangements if applicable.
EU nationals in the U.K., British nationals in the EU, and their respective employers should be thinking about what their situation may be and how to prepare. The additional complexity caused by the U.K. proposal potentially makes this more difficult. Factors to consider are the period of residence, the activities being undertaken, and the family situation. There is also an emotional, as well as a practical, dimension to this. Continuing uncertainty take its toll on people’s personal lives as well as business planning.
KPMG LLP (U.K.) is working with many businesses to help them determine the impact under these two positions and plan amidst this uncertainty, as well as how to appropriately engage with individuals who are affected. Businesses that are doing so now are likely to be better prepared for potential outcomes of the Brexit negotiations, while their staff can have greater clarity and security.
1 See: Policy paper – “The United Kingdom's exit from the European Union: safeguarding the position of EU citizens living in the UK and UK nationals living in the EU.”
2 See: Working paper "Essential Principles on Citizens' Rights" (PDF 509 KB) by the European Commission, Task Force for the Preparation and Conduct of the Negotiations with the United Kingdom under Article 50 TEU.
The KPMG Legal Services – Immigration Team has a wealth of experience in transactional, advisory, and compliance assurance services. We will be able to advise your business in relation to practical considerations in light of the above changes, as well as what this means for your long-term recruitment and compliance strategies.
Please note the KPMG International member firm in the United States does not provide immigration or labour law services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in the United Kingdom.
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
Flash Alert is an Global Mobility Services publication of KPMG LLPs Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.