The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit today held that lawsuits challenging “activities leading up to and culminating in” a U.S. federal tax assessment are barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, Code section 7421.
The case is: The Green Solution Retail, Inc. v. United States, No. 16-1281 (10th Cir. May 2, 2017). Read the Tenth Circuit’s decision [PDF 57 KB]
The company, a Colorado-based marijuana dispensary, sued to enjoin the IRS and related parties from investigating the company’s business records. The federal district court dismissed the company’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, concluding the Anti-Injunction Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act bar this action. The court relied on its circuit’s prior decision in Lowrie v. United States, where it was held that lawsuits challenging “activities leading up to and culminating in” an assessment are barred. 824 F.2d 827, 830 (10th Cir. 1987).
On appeal, the company contended that the district court had jurisdiction to hear its claims because the Supreme Court implicitly overruled Lowrie in its recent decision Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl, 135 S. Ct. 1124 (2015).
In holding that it is still bound by its decision in Lowrie, the Tenth Circuit today concluded that the company’s lawsuit was filed for the purpose of restraining an assessment and is therefore barred by the Anti-Injunction Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act, affirming the district court’s decision.
Tax professionals have observed that the Direct Marketing case dealt with the Tax Injunction Act and not the Anti-Injunction Act, and thus, the U.S. Supreme Court did not implicitly overrule Lowrie.
<p>© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.</p> <p>KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.</p>
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.