This week’s article looks at the debt cap when applying the fixed ratio method
In the second of our series of articles looking at the new corporate interest restriction regime which applies from 1 April 2017, this week we look at the debt cap when applying the fixed ratio method. Interest is disallowed to the extent the net tax-interest expense for UK companies (broadly, finance charges taken from the UK tax computations) exceeds the interest capacity. The interest capacity is partly calculated by reference to the fixed ratio debt cap limit which is based on the net finance expense in the group accounts. When calculating the debt cap limit, adjustments may be required to the figures recognised in the group income statement. An election can be considered to make further adjustments, which may be beneficial but will result in an additional compliance burden.
Under the fixed ratio method, the interest capacity is based on 30 percent of the aggregate tax-EBITDA (taken from the computations) or, if lower, the fixed ratio method debt cap limit, but is never less than £2 million.
The fixed ratio method debt cap is intended to ensure that the UK
It is a measure of the group’s net financing cost in the income statement in the group accounts. This can be contrasted to the worldwide debt cap rules which use a measure of the group’s gross finance charge.
The finance charge in the group accounts must be adjusted for certain matters such as the following:
The net tax- interest expense which has been disallowed under the corporate interest restriction rules can be carried forward indefinitely and utilised in a later period subject to the limits applying for that later period. Where this is the case, there are some complicated rules which may have a beneficial impact by increasing the debt cap limit in a later period, thereby potentially permitting the disallowed interest to be utilised in a later period.
An election can be made which amends the debt cap limit as follows:
Making the election has wider implications, e.g. to the group ratio method, and so should be considered carefully. Both the mandatory adjustments to the accounting numbers and the effect of the election will add to the compliance burden. If you have any questions about the impact these rules may have on your business, then please get in touch with one of the named contacts or your usual KPMG contact.
For more information, contact a tax professional with the KPMG member firm in the UK:
Rob Norris | Rob Norris@KPMG.co.uk
Mark Eaton | Mark Eaton@KPMG.co.uk
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.