Germany: Refinancing costs as business expenses | KPMG | GLOBAL

Germany: Deduction of refinancing costs as business expenses

Germany: Refinancing costs as business expenses

The federal tax court (BFH) addressed a situation in which a Dutch corporation held an ownership interest in a German partnership from which the Dutch entity received profit shares. The profit shares were subject to limited tax liability in Germany.

1000

Related content

In 2002, the corporation made a contribution to the German partnership, which was financed through a loan obtained in the Netherlands. The German partnership in turn was a controlling entity in a tax group with a Germany corporation as controlled company.

Subsequently to making the contribution, the Dutch corporation contributed its interests in the plaintiff to a Dutch partnership in return for ownership interests. As a result, the Dutch corporation held direct ownership interests in the Dutch partnership while its interests in the plaintiff became an indirect interest.

The BFH held that concerning an indirect interest, “type II special partner business property” can be assumed to exist and hence also to continue to exist after the contribution transaction. The loan interest had a tax-reducing effect on determining the Dutch corporation’s profit share from the ownership interest in the German partnership. According to the BFH, the controlling entity’s consolidated income was relevant. Despite the special business expenses, there was positive income at the level of the German partnership. There was no need for the BFH to decide whether the provision referred to is applicable at all in cases where partnerships are controlling entities.

 

Read an April 2017 report [PDF 322 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in Germany

 

Other topics discussed in this KPMG report concern:

  • The BFH referred a case to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) concerning whether the so-called controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules applicable to passive income with investment character in cases involving non-EU/EEA countries are compatible with the freedom of capital.
  • New documentation requirements in the field of transfer pricing were introduced with the law on the implementation of the amendments to the EU administrative assistance directive and further measures against base erosion and profit shifting.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us

 

Request for proposal

 

Submit