House Judiciary Committee reports mobile workforce bill | KPMG | GLOBAL

Legislative Update: House Judiciary Committee reports mobile workforce bill

House Judiciary Committee reports mobile workforce bill

The House Judiciary Committee yesterday favorably reported H.R. 1393, the ‘‘Mobile Workforce State Income Tax Simplification Act of 2017,’’ by a vote of 19-2.

1000

Related content

If enacted, H.R. 1393 [PDF 246 KB] would limit a state’s ability to require withholding and payment of personal income taxes unless an employee (1) is a resident of the state, or (2) has been present and performing employment duties in the state for more than 30 days during the calendar year.  

Currently there is no uniformity among states with respect to when an employer’s obligation to withhold on mobile workers commences, or when a nonresident employee’s presence in state to perform duties triggers a personal income tax filing requirement. If enacted, H.R. 1393 could ameliorate uncertainty for both employers and employees and preserve the states’ ability to impose taxes on nonresidents that work for more than 30 days within their borders. 

H.R. 1393 clarifies that being “present in a state for a day” means that the employee performs a preponderance of his or her duties in that state during such day. If an employee were to perform material duties in a resident and nonresident state during the same day, the duties would be considered performed in the nonresident state. The term “employee” is defined under the laws of the state where the services were performed; however, professional athletes and entertainers, qualified production employees, and certain public figures are specifically excluded from the definition of employee. 

If enacted, the legislation would become effective on January 1 of the second year that begins after enactment. 

The House has not yet scheduled floor action on H.R. 1393. In addition, H.R. 1393 is identical to legislation introduced earlier this year in the Senate (S. 540). The Senate has not scheduled action on S. 540 [PDF 246 KB].  

Identical legislation would need to be passed by both the House and the Senate, and to be signed (or not vetoed) by the President, to become law.

Similar legislation has been introduced in previous sessions of Congress.  

© 2017 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us

 

Request for proposal

 

Submit