This decision considers further the application of the unallowable purposes rule.
The Upper Tribunal has dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal in a recent case concerning the unallowable purposes rule. The taxpayer group had claimed a deduction in respect of the reduction in fair value of a shareholding in a group company which was deemed to represent a loan relationship. The deeming arose because the shares, in combination with a total return swap, were designed to produce an interest-like return. The First-tier Tribunal determined that the unallowable purpose rule applied to not only deny relief for this deduction (which was the intended benefit) but also for the interest debits in respect of borrowings transferred as part of the arrangement. The Upper Tribunal has now upheld that decision. Although the facts are specific to the particular arrangement, the decision provides useful guidance as to how the Courts will apply the unallowable purposes rule.
This case (PDF 127 KB) tells us a number of things about the unallowable purposes rule:
There have now been at least seven Court decisions which have considered the unallowable purposes rule and this decision further illustrates the need to carefully consider the requirements of the legislation as interpreted by this line of case law.
For further information please contact :
<p>© 2018 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.</p> <p>KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.<br> </p>