The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) today announced the release of a discussion draft on follow-up work on the interaction between the treaty provisions of the report on the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) Action 6 and the treaty entitlement of non-CIV funds.
Today’s OECD release includes a request for comments on draft examples included in the discussion draft on the follow-up work on the interaction between the treaty provisions of the report on BEPS Action 6 and the treaty entitlement of non-CIV funds.
Paragraph 14 of the final version of the BEPS report on Action 6 (Preventing the granting of treaty benefits in inappropriate circumstances) indicated that the OECD would continue to examine issues related to the treaty entitlement of non-CIV funds so that the new treaty provisions included in the report on BEPS Action 6 address adequately the treaty entitlement of these funds.
The OECD in March 2016 published a consultation document on the treaty entitlement of non-CIV funds that included a number of specific questions related to concerns, identified in the comments received on previous discussion drafts related to the report on BEPS Action 6, as to how the new provisions included in that report could affect the treaty entitlement of non-CIV funds as well as possible ways of addressing these concerns. Comments were received in response to that consultation document.
Today’s discussion draft has been prepared to provide stakeholders with information on the subsequent developments in the work on the interaction between the treaty provisions of the report on BEPS Action 6 and the treaty entitlement of non-CIV funds, including the conclusions reached at the May 2016 meeting of Working Party 1 and the subsequent work on the development of examples related to the application of the principal purposes test rule included in the BEPS Action 6 report with respect to some common transactions involving non-CIV funds. The discussion draft invites comments on three draft examples under consideration by the Working Party for inclusion in the commentary on the principal purposes test rule. Comments are requested by 3 February 2017.
The OECD today also announced that Kazakhstan, Côte d’Ivoire, and Bermuda are joining the inclusive framework on BEPS, bringing the total number of countries and jurisdictions participating on an equal footing in the BEPS project to 94. Read the OECD release.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.