The New York City Department of Finance issued an updated guidance memorandum addressing eligibility for broker-dealer receipts allocation. Under the New York City unincorporated business tax (UBT) and general corporation tax (GCT) measures, a securities or commodities broker-dealer is eligible to source certain receipts for apportionment purposes based on the mailing address of the customer responsible for paying the service fee—rather than sourcing such receipts from the fees based on where the taxpayer performed the services.
Many taxpayers registered as broker-dealers with locations in New York benefit from the ability to source receipts based on the customer location. The updated memorandum addresses two issues:
With respect to the first issue, the memorandum appears to clarify that an entity must be registered with the Securities & Exchange Commission / Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission / National Futures Association in order to avail itself of the broker-dealer sourcing provisions.
On the second issue, the memorandum provides that there is no basis for extending the application of the broker-dealer sourcing provisions to unregistered owners of registered single member limited liability companies, despite the tax treatment of such wholly owned companies as entities disregarded as separate from their owners.
It is understood that the Department of Finance’s new pronouncement regarding broker-dealer receipts allocation will be applied on audit examination to all open tax years. As such, taxpayers need to consider whether exposure now exists for prior tax years. Taxpayers also need to consider the memorandum on a prospective basis. Finally, while the same broker-dealer receipts allocation provisions have been in place for the New York State corporate franchise tax both before and now under corporate tax reform legislation, there are no official pronouncements from the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance addressing either of the two topics covered in the City’s memorandum.
Read a December 2016 report [PDF 41 KB] prepared by KPMG’s State and Local Tax practice
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.