The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit today affirmed a decision of the U.S. Tax Court that the taxpayer was not entitled to claim net operating loss (NOL) carrybacks because the evidence did not show that the subject real estate was abandoned or became worthless during 2008.
The case is: Tucker v. Commissioner, No. 16-11042 (11th Cir. November 21, 2016). Read the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion [PDF 135 KB]
The taxpayer (an individual) was a developer of residential real estate in Florida. Because of the sharp decline in the real estate market in 2007 and 2008, the taxpayer’s solely owned S corporation made a substantial “write down” of the value of the properties. The S corporation reported a loss of approximately $10.8 million on its income tax return for 2008—of which about $8.9 million was attributable to the write down of the real estate inventory to current market value as of December 31, 2008.
The taxpayer then claimed a flow-through of loss of about $6.78 million on his individual income tax return and a net operating loss (NOL) of more than $6.7 million. The taxpayer elected to carry back the 2008 NOL to prior years, and filed for a refund of almost $2 million based on the NOL carrybacks.
On audit, the IRS determined that the S corporation’s allowable loss for 2008 was only $1.5 million, and thus disallowed the taxpayer’s claimed NOL carrybacks. A notice of deficiency was issued, and the taxpayer filed a petition with the Tax Court challenging the deficiency notice. The Tax Court issued a memorandum opinion in 2015, denying the taxpayer’s claim that the properties were abandoned or became worthless in 2008.
The Eleventh Circuit today affirmed. The appeals court did not find that the S corporation had abandoned the properties in 2008, nor did the record reveal that the properties become worthless to the S corporation in 2008.
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.