The Puerto Rico Treasury Department issued guidance concerning the alternative minimum tax (AMT).
Administrative Determination No. 16-11 (September 30, 3016) provides guidance in the wake of the March 2016 decision of the federal district court:
The U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico in March 2016 issued an opinion and order permanently enjoining the Secretary of the Puerto Rico Treasury from enforcing a component of the commonwealth’s AMT. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Zaragoza Gómez, No. 3:15-cv-03018 (D. P.R. 2016)
Notably, in the view of the federal district court, the AMT imposed on tangible property and services transferred from an “out-of-island entity” to a Puerto Rico affiliate discriminated against interstate commerce and also violated the Equal Protection Clause. Read TaxNewsFlash-United States
The guidance—Administrative Determination No. 16-11—provides that for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2016, taxpayers will not be required to include in their AMT computation certain components (e.g., intercompany expense allocations and related-party purchase components).
For eligible taxpayers, the AMT computation will be 30% of the amount by which their AMT income for the tax year exceeds the exempt amount, reduced by the alternative minimum credit for taxes paid in foreign jurisdictions for that year.
For those taxpayers whose estimated tax payments for tax year 2016 have not yet been made (that is, the payment date has not lapsed), these taxpayers will not have to include AMT components expressly excluded from the computation. If any portion of the already remitted estimated tax payments are attributable to the excluded components, the amounts may be fully applied against taxable income for 2016.
For those taxpayers whose estimated tax installment payments have already been made and deposited for tax year 2016—and the aggregate amount already paid is equal to or greater than the required estimated tax payment, determined after a re-computation to reflect the holding in the federal district court’s case—no further payments are required for the remaining estimated tax installments for the tax year.
Taxpayers that paid AMT for tax year 2015, with the AMT being based on the excluded components, will be entitled to re-determine their AMT for 2015 without the excluded components. If the amount of AMT paid with the originally filed return for tax year 2015 exceeds the revised AMT, the taxpayer would be entitled to a credit for the amount overpaid for the tax year.
Taxpayers that are eligible for a credit relating to any amount of such overpaid AMT can: (1) apply the excess as an AMT credit contribution in subsequent years (subject to the limitations set forth in section 1051.02); or (2) apply the excess amount as a payment to their tax year 2016 estimate.
Taxpayers electing option (2), must file an amended income tax return for tax year 2015 along with Form 483.3, Step Form Schedule a Corporation - Part V Taxable Year 2015.
Administrative Determination No. 16-11 furthers clarifies that the 51% disallowance for expenses paid (or to be paid) by a taxpayer to a related person that does not conduct business in Puerto Rico, or paid to the head office (or home office) located outside of Puerto Rico, continues to be valid.
For more information, contact a KPMG tax professional in Puerto Rico:
Rolando Lopez | +1 787-756-6020 | email@example.com
Carlos Molina | +1 787-622-5311 | firstname.lastname@example.org
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.