The Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) released an opinion in the EC’s case brought against Luxembourg (C-274/15) concerning an exemption from value added tax (VAT) for services provided by an “independent group of persons” to its members.
Under Luxembourg VAT law, a measure provides an exemption from VAT relating to services provided by an “independent group of persons” to its members. The VAT Directive 2006/112/EC, as transposed into Luxembourg law, provides that services provided by an independent group of persons to its members can benefit from a VAT exemption, as long as certain specific conditions are satisfied. In the proceedings before the CJEU, the EC is seeking a declaration that the VAT regime in Luxembourg is contrary to the VAT Directive.
The CJEU Advocate General found:
The Advocate General concluded that independent groups of persons are not to be considered as taxable persons for VAT purposes, insofar as a group is rendering VAT-exempt services to its members.
If the CJEU were to follow the opinion of Advocate General in its judgment, there could be far-reaching consequences concerning current use of the VAT exemption. It appears such a judgment also could affect some of the reasons for using independent groups of persons, and would limit their use to very specific situations—for example, only a small fraction of economic operators like the medical sector would be able to use this structure, provided that they operate an activity that would be completely exempt from VAT.
While the Advocate General’s opinion is not binding on the CJEU, it does represent a proposal for a legal solution. It is up to the judges who will now begin their deliberations in this case, with judgment to be given at a later date. Still, given the opinion of the Advocate General, tax professionals have observed that now is an appropriate opportunity to review existing independent groups of person structures and to anticipate the consequences resulting from a judgment that could follow the opinion of the Advocate General.
Read an October 2016 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in Luxembourg: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in the case Commission v. Luxembourg released on 6 October 2016
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.