The U.S. Supreme Court today denied certiorari in a case concerning California’s treatment of a taxpayer’s claim to elect and apply the Multistate Tax Compact rules.
The case is: Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
The California Supreme Court in December 2015 held that certain taxpayers could not elect to use the Multistate Tax Compact’s allocation and apportionment provisions to compute their California taxable income. In the state high court’s view, the Compact was not akin to a binding contract. Therefore, a signatory state was not required to offer the Compact election. In reaching this conclusion, the high court overturned an appeals court decision holding for the taxpayers.
While the petition for certiorari was pending, the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) issued guidance stating that it would take no action on Compact election refund claims until the litigation had been fully resolved by either a denial of a petition for certiorari or any final state court action after a decision by the high court. With the denial of certiorari, it is likely the FTB will start issuing notices of proposed assessment or denials of Compact-related refund claims. In fact, the FTB announced today that guidance for potentially affected taxpayers will be forthcoming shortly.
Read an October 2016 report [PDF 49 KB] prepared by KPMG LLP: U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Review California Compact Election Case
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.