The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit today reversed and remanded a decision of the U.S. Tax Court concerning two French taxes and the social security totalization agreement between the United States and France. The D.C. Circuit concluded that the Tax Court committed legal error in its analysis.
The case is: Eshel v. Commission, No. 14-1215 (D.C. Cir. August 5, 2016). Read the D.C. Circuit’s decision [PDF 82 KB]
The Tax Court in its 2014 opinion reported that the United States and France in 1987 entered into a totalization agreement to coordinate benefits under their respective social security systems. The individual taxpayers in 2008 and 2009 paid two taxes to the French government—la contribution sociale généralisée (CSG) and la contribution pour le remboursement de la dette sociale (CRDS)—and claimed credits for these payments under Code section 901. The IRS disallowed the claimed credits, contending that the taxpayers paid CSG and CRDS to France in accordance with the terms of the United States-France totalization agreement.
The Tax Court granted summary judgment for the IRS, finding that CSG and CRDS—having been adopted by France after the totalization agrement—amended or supplemented the totalization agreement and thus were not creditable for U.S. income tax purposes. The Tax Court concluded that U.S. social security provisions precluded the taxpayers’ foreign tax credits for CSG and CRDS paid to France in 2008 and 2009.
Today, the D.C. Circuit reversed and remanded, finding that the Tax Court committed legal error in not analyzing the text of the totalization agreement or the understanding of the U.S. and French governments.
© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.