Hong Kong has accepted the OECD's invitation to join—as an “associate”—the project and framework under the OECD's final reports and recommendations of the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project.
Hong Kong has committed to the comprehensive BEPS package, including the four minimum standards—i.e., in the areas of harmful tax practices, tax treaty abuse, country-by-country reporting requirements and improvements in cross-border tax dispute resolution—and to the consistent implementation of these standards.
This announcement marks the government’s first formal public action regarding the BEPS project and may be seen as an important step forward for the territory with respect to transfer pricing enforcement. However, formal legislative action and adoption of the BEPS recommendations by Hong Kong may be delayed, given the standard governmental process and a backlog of issues pending before the Legislative Council. It may be some time before the necessary amendments are approved.
Tax professionals expect that the OECD’s BEPS recommendations will be adopted by Hong Kong in time. However, it remains to be seen how long the process will take for the recommendations to be given legislative effect. Also, it is not yet certain how or when the Inland Revenue Department would adjust its transfer pricing audit approach and put the BEPS recommendations into practice. In any event, prudent taxpayers would take certain action steps now to assess whether their transfer pricing policies and practices are consistent with the BEPS recommendations and to address any deviations from the BEPS recommendations.
The OECD’s BEPS project was launched in September 2013 with an aim that profits would be taxed in the jurisdiction where economic activities take place and value is created. From this project, a comprehensive package of measures, consisting of reports on the 15 BEPS actions, were developed and issued in October 2015.
Hong Kong is not a member of the OECD and, consequently, did not participate in the development of the measures to address base erosion and profit shifting. However, as an associate member, Hong Kong would have “equal footing” with the other countries and jurisdictions to implement the recommendations, including the four minimum standards:
Model provisions to prevent treaty abuse, including through treaty shopping that will impede the use of “conduit companies” in countries and jurisdictions with favourable tax treaties, to channel investments and obtain reduced rates of taxation.
Standardised country-by-country reporting to afford tax administrations a global picture of where the profits, tax, and economic activities of multinational entities are reported, and the ability to use this information to assess transfer pricing and other BEPS risks, thereby allowing tax administrations to focus their tax audit resources to areas where they will be most effectively deployed.
A revitalised peer review process to address harmful tax practices, including patent boxes when they include harmful features, as well as a commitment to transparency through the mandatory, spontaneous exchange of relevant information on taxpayer-specific rulings which, in the absence of information exchange, could give rise to BEPS concerns.
An agreement to secure progress on dispute resolution, with the strong political commitment to the effective and timely resolution of disputes through the mutual agreement procedure (MAP).
For more information, contact a tax professional with KPMG’s Global Transfer Pricing Services in Hong Kong:
John Kondos | +852 2685 7457 | email@example.com
Lu Chen | +852 2143 8777 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Irene Lee | +852 2685 7372 | email@example.com
Chloe Li | 852 2143 8710 | firstname.lastname@example.org
William Wong | +852 2685 7599 | email@example.com
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.