The Mumbai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that the tax officer must prove that the taxpayer’s real intention in incurring an advertising, marketing, and promotion expenditure was to benefit related parties, and not the taxpayer’s own business. Because this proof was not shown, the tribunal held that the advertising, marketing, and promotion was not an international transaction, and thus a transfer pricing adjustment was not appropriate.
The case is: L’Óreal India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT [ITA Nos. 7714, 1119; 976/Mum-2014 and 518, 335/Mum-2015]
The taxpayer was engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing cosmetics.
During a transfer pricing assessment proceeding, the tax officer found all but one of the taxpayer’s international transactions with related parties were at arm’s length. The one exception was an advertisement, marketing, and production expenditure, and the tax officer ultimately made a transfer pricing adjustment for this expenditure, and that adjustment was upheld by the Dispute Resolution Panel.
The taxpayer countered that its advertisement, marketing, and production expenditure was not an international transaction, but was instead incurred with respect to products in the Indian market (and not incurred for promoting the brand of the related parties). The tribunal agreed, and found that the tax officer’s assumption that the advertisement, marketing, and production expenditure would have benefited the related party-owner of the brand was flawed in that this assumed that the taxpayer would not have incurred such advertisement, marketing, and production expenses to promote its own business.
Read a May 2016 report [PDF 335 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: Agreement between taxpayer and its AE and proof that the AMP expenditure is not for the taxpayers business in India are prerequisite for treating the AMP expenditure as an international transaction
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.