The IRS issued an adverse determination that denied tax exemption status to an accountable care organization that did not participate in the “Medicare shared savings program” (MSSP). The IRS concluded that the negotiation of payer agreements on behalf of unrelated healthcare providers does not constitute a charitable activity.
Read LTR 201615022 [PDF 10.2 MB] released April 8, 2016, and dated January 15, 2016.
An accountable care organization (ACO) is a healthcare organization characterized by a payment and care-delivery model that ties healthcare provider (e.g., physicians) reimbursements to quality metrics.
In Notice 2011-20 [PDF 52 KB], the IRS set forth the criteria for demonstrating that that a tax-exempt organization’s participation in the MSSP through an ACO would not result in private inurement or private benefit. The the ACO must be structured in accordance with the following five factors:
Importantly, the IRS notice provides that MSSP payments received by a tax-exempt organization from an ACO are substantially related to the performance of a charitable purpose of lessening the burdens of government. However, participation in an ACO that conducts non-MSSP activities generally would be unlikely to lessen the burdens of government—although certain non-MSSP activities might still further or be substantially related to an exempt purpose.
An IRS fact sheet [PDF 46 KB] issued in October 2011, shortly after the IRS notice, further clarifies that an ACO engaged exclusively in the MSSP could qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3), provided that it meets all the other requirements of organizations described in that section. In addition, the IRS fact sheet notes that an ACO engaged in both MSSP and non-MSSP activities may qualify for recognition of section 501(c)(3) status provided its other activities accomplish charitable purposes and the ACO meets all of the other requirements for organizations described in section 501(c)(3).
In LTR 201615022, a hospital system formed an ACO to serve as the legal and operational vehicle for achieving clinical care integration, coordination, and accountability among both employed and independent physicians.
The ACO did not engage in the direct delivery of medical care, provide health services to the general public, or participate in the MSSP. Rather, the ACO operated to further the “triple aim” healthcare reform goals established by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act—(1) reducing healthcare costs for individuals; (2) improving patient access to and quality of care; and (3) improving population health and patient experience. The ACO intended to achieve these ends by tethering compensation for healthcare providers to the achievement of certain performance measures.
The IRS concluded that the ACO did not qualify for recognition of exemption under section 501(c)(3) because a substantial activity of the ACO was the negotiation of payer agreements on behalf of healthcare providers—approximately half of whom were not employed by the system or its hospitals—and generally, this is not a charitable activity. Additionally, the IRS found that the ACO was not lessening the burdens of government.
Congress established the MSSP to be conducted through ACOs in order to promote quality improvements and cost savings in health care. Therefore, participation in the MSSP by an ACO generally would further the charitable purpose of lessening the burdens of government. In contrast, the Affordable Care Act does not provide an objective manifestation that the government considers non-MSSP-related ACO activities to be its burden, even if they ultimately further the legislation's overall goals.
While the IRS initially indicated that non-MSSP ACOs might qualify for tax-exempt status, this adverse determination suggests that only certain ACOs will so qualify.
For more information, contact the Managing Director-in-Charge of KPMG's Washington National Tax Exempt Organizations Tax group
D. Greg Goller | +1 (703) 286- 8391 | firstname.lastname@example.org
© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.