The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit today affirmed a decision of the U.S. Tax Court with respect a conservation easement donation by the taxpayer. The “highest and best use” of the property subject to the conservation easement was upheld, but the Eleventh Circuit reversed the Tax Court’s re-valuation of the easement and remanded the issue back to the Tax Court.
The case is: Palmer Ranch Holdings Ltd. v. Commissioner, NO. 14-14167 (11th Cir. February 5, 2016). Read the Eleventh Circuit’s decision [PDF 236 KB]
The taxpayer corporation owned a parcel of land in Florida, and had intended to sell the property for residential development. However, the land was a “wildlife corridor” that bald eagles used to reach their feeding grounds in Sarasota Bay. Instead of selling the property, the taxpayer made a donation of a conservation easement, and deducted the easement’s value of $25.2 million from its 2006 income tax return. The taxpayer reached this valuation on the basis of the property’s highest and best use as a residential development.
The IRS disallowed the deduction, finding the taxpayer had overvalued the easement’s value. The IRS countered that the property would have been developed for fewer units, and accordingly, determined the valuation would be $7.75 million.
The taxpayer petitioned the Tax Court, which held in favor of the taxpayer’s highest and best use of the property, but re-valued the easement at just over $21 million instead of $25.2 million.
Today, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the Tax Court’s determination of the property’s highest and best use, but reversed the valuation of $21 million and remanded the case to the Tax Court for a re-valuation of the easement.
© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.