The California Supreme Court held that several taxpayers could not elect to apportion their income to California using the allocation and apportionment provisions contained in the Multistate Tax Compact in lieu of the apportionment formula mandated under state law.
The California high court, in a long-awaited decision, reversed the findings of an appellate court. Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, S206587 (Cal. December 31, 2015)
In the high court’s view, the Multistate Tax Compact is not a binding reciprocal agreement among states, and the legislature’s 1993 repeal of the election was effective even if California had not withdrawn from the Compact entirely. The state’s high court also rejected the appellate court’s holding that California’s reenactment rule was “offended” when the legislature adopted a double-weighted sales apportionment formula in 1993 but did not repeal the Compact.
Read a January 2016 report [PDF 116 KB] prepared by KPMG LLP: SALT Alert! 2016-01: California: State Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Court’s Ruling in Gillette
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.