Ruling on mutual insurance company’s rights | KPMG | GLOBAL

Policyholder lacks basis in mutual insurance company’s membership rights

Ruling on mutual insurance company’s rights

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today in a case of “first impression” held that the taxpayers—life insurance policyholders—did not have any basis in a mutual life insurance company’s membership rights, and thus, their basis in the stock derived from the demutualization of the mutual insurance companies was zero ($0).


Related content

The case is: Dorrance v. United States, Nos. 13-16548 and 13-16635 (9th Cir. December 9, 2015). Read the Ninth Circuit’s decision [PDF 147 KB] that includes a dissent.


The taxpayers received and then sold stock derived from the demutualization of five mutual life insurance companies from which they had purchased life insurance policies. On filing their individual income tax return, the taxpayers initially asserted a zero cost basis in the stock and paid tax on the gain. Later, they filed a claim for a refund of the full amount of taxes paid on the stock sale. They asserted that the stock represented a return of previously paid policy premiums or, alternatively, that the premiums paid would be counted toward their basis in the stock because their mutual rights were incapable of valuation.

The IRS denied the refund claim, and the taxpayers filed a refund action in federal district court. The lower court held that the taxpayers had a calculable basis in the stock (but not at the level claimed by the taxpayers) and determined that they were entitled to a partial refund. 

The Ninth Circuit today reversed, finding that taxpayers who sell stock obtained through demutualization cannot claim a basis in that stock for tax purposes because they had a zero basis in the mutual rights that were extinguished during the demutualization. 

KPMG observation

The difference between contract rights and membership rights was critical to the resolution of this case.  The Ninth Circuit found that the premiums paid covered the rights under the insurance contract, but not any membership rights. Thus, the value at demutualization was not derived from something paid for by the taxpayers.  

The “zero basis” issue and the open transaction doctrine were also considered in prior cases—one in 2009 in the Federal Circuit (Fisher) that affirmed a U.S. Court of Federal Claims decision for the taxpayer, and the other from 2013 in the D.C. Circuit (Reuben) that was decided in favor of the government. With today’s Ninth Circuit decision for the government, the split among the circuit courts continues, until or unless the taxpayers seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve the issue. 

© 2017 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us


Request for proposal