The Mumbai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that an Assessing Officer cannot “mechanically” refer a taxpayer’s international transactions to a Transfer Pricing Officer for a determination of the arm’s length price, but must first independently conclude that the taxpayer did not determine the arm’s length price or did not maintain appropriate documents based on statutory provisions.
The tribunal further held that no transfer pricing adjustment can be made in instances when the taxpayer enjoys the benefit of a “tax holiday” or when the tax rate of the related party’s country of residence is greater than the tax rate in India. In other words, there cannot be a transfer pricing adjustment when tax avoidance is not possible. The case is: DCIT v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (ITA no. 7513/2010)
The assessment year at issue was 2005-06. The Assessing Officer—following a then-applicable instruction from the Central Board of Direct Taxes that required a mandatory referral to the Transfer Pricing Officer to determine the arm’s length price when the aggregate value of the international transactions exceeded INR 5 crores—referred the taxpayer’s international transactions to the Transfer Pricing Officer for a determination of the arm’s length price. The Transfer Pricing Officer made a transfer pricing adjustment that was “mechanically” incorporated in the Assessing Officer’s order.
The taxpayer sought administrative review, and the Commissioner deleted the transfer pricing adjustment.The tax administration filed for judicial review, and the tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer must have a prima facie belief, based on certain information or documentation, that a referral to the Transfer Pricing Officer was required. The tribunal also noted that there can be no transfer pricing adjustment in instances when there would be no tax avoidance.
Read a November 2015 report [PDF 348 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: Assessing Officer to apply his/her mind and form a belief on the transfer pricing report filed by the taxpayer; failing which a transfer pricing addition cannot be sustained. No TP addition can be made when tax avoidance is not possible
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.