India: Income related to seconded employees; withholding tax certificates

India: Income related to seconded employees

The KPMG member firm in India has prepared reports describing the following developments (read more at the hyperlinks provided below).

Related content

  • Payment to Hong Kong company for services of seconded employees taxable as “fees for technical services”: The Bangalore Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that payment made to a foreign company for the services of “deputed personnel” under the secondment agreement is taxable as fees for technical services under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The case is: Food World Supermarkets Ltd.  Read a November 2015 report [PDF 425 KB]
  • Validation of tax returns electronically: Taxpayers not required to use a digital signature certificate for uploading their India tax returns are eligible for “e-verifying” their returns. The Central Board of Direct Taxes issued an order permitting an e-verification. Read a November 2015 report [PDF 389 KB]
  • Treaty’s LOB clause not applicable when taxpayer has bona fide business activities in UAE: The Rajkot Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that the India-UAE income tax treaty benefits cannot be denied a foreign shipping company that has bona fide business activities in the UAE by applying the treaty’s limitation of benefit (LOB) provisions. The tribunal found that the LOB provisions are applicable only when the main purpose (or one of the main purposes) of the creation of an entity was to obtain benefits of the tax treaty that otherwise would not be available. The case is: MUR Shipping DMC Co, UAE. Read a November 2015 report [PDF 410 KB]
  • Taxpayer is entitled to withholding credit of sister concern: The Delhi High Court held that the taxpayer was entitled to a credit of a “sister concern” for tax withheld (deducted) at source. A vendor made an error listed the taxpayer’s account number in the withholding certificate (rather than the number of the sister concern). Also, the sister concern did not claim use of the credit. Accordingly, the tax authority could not deny the taxpayer’s claim for the credit on a mere technical ground that the corresponding income was not that of the taxpayer. The case is: Relcom.  Read a November 2015 report [PDF 441 KB]
  • Taxation of income, rupee-denominated bonds issued offshore: The Reserve Bank of India issued guidance clarifying the tax treatment of income related to rupee-denominated bonds issued by Indian companies outside India. Read an October 2015 report [PDF 375 KB]

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us

 

Request for proposal

 

Submit

KPMG's new digital platform

KPMG's new digital platform