The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a 2014 decision of the U.S. Tax Court denying the taxpayers, in the consolidated cases, the ability to use the completed contract method of accounting in computing gains from sales of property under long-term construction contracts because the contracts did not qualify as home construction contracts. As such, the taxpayers were to have used the percentage of completion method in computing their gains.
The Tax Court found that the bulk sale and custom lot contracts were not home construction contracts (as defined by section 460(e)) and that, as such, the taxpayer could not account for these contracts using the completed contract method of accounting, but was to use a permissible method of accounting for long-term contracts (such as the percentage of completion method).
The Fifth Circuit affirmed. Howard Hughes Co. LLC v. Commissioner, No. 14-60915 and No. 14-60921 (5th Cir. October 27, 2015). Read the Fifth Circuit’s decision [PDF 170 KB] (Note that this decision was updated by the Fifth Circuit on December 7, 2015).
Read an initial discussion of the Tax Court’s decision (June 2014) in this proceeding: TaxNewsFlash-United States [PDF 74 KB]
© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.