Australia’s government released a consultation Exposure Draft on 7 October 2015 that: (1) would bring into the goods and services tax (GST) system, non-residents who supply intangibles and services to Australian resident end-consumers; and (2) would remove from the GST system, those non-residents who supply, through their overseas business, intangibles and services to GST registered businesses.
Submissions are required by 21 October 2015.
The purpose of these amendments would be to create a “level playing field” between overseas online retailers and “bricks and mortar” retailers located in Australia selling to private consumers, while at the same time recognising that non-residents who make supplies to Australian registered businesses would not have to register and account for GST on business-to-business transactions that offer no net GST revenue gain to the government.
The amendments, if enacted, would result in non-residents no longer having to register for GST when they only make GST-free supplies. Also, provided non-residents do not make supplies through an enterprise carried on in Australia, they would avoid GST registration and ongoing compliance under the following scenarios (these would no longer be “connected with Australia” and would be outside the scope of GST):
While this revision would be good news for non-residents, they would still need to consider GST registration in situations when there are GST costs incurred in Australia that they want to recover.
There will be heavier emphasis on the reverse-charge provisions to require Australian businesses that are not entitled to full input tax credit recoverability to self-assess GST on supplies by non-residents that would no longer be “connected with Australia.”
Few would argue with the purpose of the proposed legislation, but as usual the devil is in the detail. It remains to be seen how the proposed amendment to the concept of “permanent establishment” would align with the changes that are expected under the current base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) debate, and whether it would be sufficiently robust to cater for technology issues, such as server location.
Read an October 2015 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in Australia: Lighter touch GST for cross border transactions
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.