Foreign currency transactions – Advance consideration

Foreign currency transactions – Advance consideration

Draft IFRIC aims to clarify the transaction date used to determine the spot exchange rate

Partner

KPMG in the UK

Contact

Related content

KPMG web article 'Draft IFRIC on advance consideration in foreign currency' publication image: road traffic

The proposals could have a significant impact on a company’s net profit or loss.

For foreign currency transactions involving an advance payment or receipt, current IFRS is unclear as to which date should be used for translation.

Under current IFRS, foreign currency transactions are recorded in the company’s functional currency by applying the spot exchange rate on the date of the transaction – i.e. on the date when the transaction first qualifies for recognition.

However, when foreign currency consideration is paid or received in advance of the item it relates to – which may be an asset, an expense or income – IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates is not clear on how to determine the date of the transaction. This has resulted in diversity in practice when translating the related item. To address this, the IFRS Interpretations Committee has issued a draft interpretation.

 

“Companies – particularly those in the construction sector – should consider the impact of these proposals on their financial reporting, as well as their accounting systems.” 

When would the interpretation apply?

The interpretation would apply when a company:

  • pays or receives consideration denominated or priced in a foreign currency; and
  • recognises a non-monetary prepayment asset or deferred income liability – e.g. non-refundable advance consideration – before recognising the related item at a later date.

The interpretation would not apply when the related item is required to be recognised using a fair value measurement basis – e.g. financial assets and liabilities. Companies would not have to apply the interpretation to insurance contracts and income taxes. 

Establishing the date of the transaction

The date of the transaction – which is required to determine the spot exchange rate for translation – would be the earlier of:

  • the date of initial recognition of the non-monetary prepayment asset or deferred income liability; and
  • the date that the related item is recognised in the financial statements.

Our worked example shows how the proposals would be applied.

If the transaction is recognised in stages, then a transaction date would be established for each stage. The spot exchange rate for each date would be applied to translate each part of the transaction. 

Potential impacts

A company should consider:

  • the potential effect of the proposals on net profit or loss;
  • the proposals’ interaction with other standards; and
  • any changes to accounting systems that could be required to book transactions in the way the interpretation requires.

The effect of the proposals on net profit or loss may be significant if applying the proposals means the company translates an acquired asset using the spot exchange rate at the date when consideration to acquire the asset is paid, instead of at a later date – e.g. on receiving delivery of the asset.

Although exchange rates will fluctuate between these dates, no foreign exchange gains or losses would be recognised in respect of the translation of the acquired asset if the proposals are applied.

In some cases – e.g. revenue or expense transactions in foreign currency – the aggregate effect on net profit or loss may be the same regardless of which spot exchange rate is used to measure revenue or expense, but individual line items in the statement of profit or loss may be affected.

The draft interpretation does not impact the accounting for monetary assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currency – including cash held as a result of receipt of advance consideration.

It is worth bearing in mind that other standards may require initial measurement of the related item on a fair value measurement basis at a date that differs from the date when the non-monetary prepayment asset or deferred income liability is initially recognised. In this case, the draft interpretation would not apply.

Transition

Companies would be permitted to early adopt the interpretation. They would also have a choice of applying it either:

  • retrospectively; or
  • prospectively – i.e. from the beginning of:
    • the reporting period in which the interpretation is first applied; or
    • an earlier reporting period presented in the comparatives.

Next steps

Read our comment letter. For more information on the proposals, read the IASB press release or speak to your usual KPMG contact.

© 2016 KPMG IFRG Limited is a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG IFRG Limited, registered in England No 5253019. Registered office: 15 Canada Square, London, E14 5GL, UK.

Connect with us

 

Request for proposal

 

Submit

KPMG's new digital platform

KPMG International has created a state of the art digital platform that enhances your experience, optimized to discover new and related content.