Congress returns to Washington this week, and will immediately be forced to confront looming deadlines on a number of high profile issues. While Congress attempted to address most of these matters over the summer, Congress finds itself with only a few weeks to address the following items (as well as any other legislative business that might arise):
In addition, among the tax measures that Congress will confront are bills that would:
Congress may also consider legislation, not yet introduced, to reform taxation of international business income and provide new incentives for development of intellectual property, in the form of an “innovation box.” Although the prospects for this legislation are quite uncertain, its proponents may offer it in connection with highway and infrastructure spending legislation.
It appears likely that Congress would once again turn its attention to the 50+ expired tax preference provisions popularly known as the “tax extenders” before the end of the year.
The Senate Finance Committee in July 2015 approved (i.e., “reported” to the full Senate) a bill that would extend for two years—from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2016—the 51 tax extenders that expired in 2014 and reinstate one provision that expired in 2013. The full Senate has yet to consider the Finance Committee bill.
The House approach to the tax extenders differs. Over the course of several months, and similar to its approach last year, the House has considered several of the tax extender provisions individually, with a view to making them permanent. To date, the House has passed legislation for permanent extension of the:
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is scheduled to release final reports of its base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project in October 2015 through December 2015. These reports and international actions with respect to them may engender a U.S. legislative response. These reports therefore bear watching.
One of the BEPS actions would aim for greater tax transparency by requiring country-by-country reporting by taxpayers. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) in August 2015 sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, expressing their concerns regarding the inclusion on the IRS / Treasury Department’s Priority Guidance Plan of a project to issue regulations relating to country-by-country (CbC) reporting requirements. This, too, may be an area to watch.
<p>© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.</p> <p>KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.</p>
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.