The Delhi Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld application of the profit split method (PSM) when different activities performed by the taxpayer and its related parties were inextricably linked, and the entities contributed significantly to the value chain of provision of software services to the end-user customer.
The tribunal rejected the Transfer Pricing Officer’s conclusion that PSM was adopted only to camouflage loss at net level, but instead the tribunal found that “…the decision as what is the most appropriate method does not depend on the fact as to whether an assessee is having loss or has a profit.” In reaching its conclusion, the tribunal noted that for the preceding and successive years, the tax department had accepted the taxpayer’s use of PSM as well as the taxpayer’s allocation of profit split between the taxpayer and its related party at 40:60.
The case is: DCIT v. Infogain India Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 6134/Del/2012)
The taxpayer was the “back-end” software service provider for its U.S. parent company. The taxpayer provided the back-end software services to its related parties, with the taxpayer selecting PSM as the most appropriate method to benchmark its related-party transactions in its transfer pricing report. The taxpayer applied a profit split of 60:40.
The Transfer Pricing Officer rejected the taxpayer’s approach, and applying the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) proposed a transfer pricing adjustment. The Dispute Resolution Panel upheld this finding.
The taxpayer filed for review by the tribunal, which found that the PSM was the most appropriate method when, as in this situation, the activities of the taxpayer and its related parties were inextricably linked and that both parties contributed to the value chain.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.