Australia: Transfer pricing, changing nature of tax controversy

Australia: Transfer pricing, tax controversy

Tax professionals in Australia, in considering how to assess risk and prepare for potential controversy in light of the changing tax landscape, are focusing on a number of key themes. These include the following:

Related content

  • The importance of assessing and contrasting positions taken, against positions that the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Commissioner may adopt to assess the materiality of risk in any perceived differences and to prepare for potential controversy.
  • In light of subdivision 815-B of the 1997 Act, and the Chevron litigation awaiting judgment, the Commissioner may go to considerable lengths (including potentially obtaining expert evidence) to determine what “arm’s length conditions” might be in “comparable circumstances”. Taxpayers need to be prepared to engage with the Commissioner about this.
  • Transfer pricing documentation prepared at a high level will not likely provide sufficient defence to an ATO audit. Practically, an organisation needs to revisit its documentation regularly, manage “operational drift” as the business grows, and prepare an “audit ready file” of additional contemporaneous documentation and evidence to support key transactions.
  • Practical implications of the proposed country-by-country (CbyC) reporting rules, and in particular, the need for a multidisciplinary approach to preparing for them. Taxpayers need to consider the importance of putting in place strategies and resources to obtain, review, and present the required data reliably and discussed the merits of undertaking a “dry run” to identify potential issues ahead of CbyC coming into effect. 
  • There is a need to consider CbyC and potential tax controversy in the broader tax transparency environment and to determine that internal and external stakeholders are managed appropriately. 


Read a September 2015 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in Australia: Transfer pricing and the changing nature of tax controversy

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us


Request for proposal



KPMG's new digital platform

KPMG's new digital platform