The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld an interest adjustment on a loan that the taxpayer advanced to a related entity. The tribunal found that the comparable uncontrolled price of a “quasi capital loan” cannot be zero or “nil” unless the loan was only made for a transitory period of time and that, in fact, the reward for the value of money advanced was an opportunity for capital investment or some other similar benefit.
The case is: Soma Textile & Industries Ltd. v. ACIT
The taxpayer was engaged in the manufacture of textile cotton fabrics, and had a wholly owned subsidiary in the UAE. The taxpayer had both invested funds and advanced funds to the UAE subsidiary. The taxpayer contended that the funds advanced or loaned to the UAE subsidiary were “in the nature of a contribution towards quasi capital” because of reasons of commercial expediency for the interest-free loan.
The Transfer Pricing Officer, however, determined that commercial expediency was not an appropriate test in arriving at the arm’s length price, but that the standard was what would be the price of such transactions if entered into by independent, unrelated parties. The Transfer Pricing Officer then applied an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2% as the arm’s length price, and made a transfer pricing adjustment. This was upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals).
The Ahmedabad tribunal agreed, and set out clear parameters regarding the concept of “quasi capital” with respect to funds advanced between related entities (i.e., whether the funds were to be considered as loans or as quasi equity).
Read a July 2015 report [PDF 427 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: Interest adjustment on advances made to associated enterprises upheld and the meaning of quasi capital elucidated
Contact a tax professional with KPMG's Global Transfer Pricing Services.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.