President Obama on December 19, 2104, signed the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (P.L. 113-295, referred to below as the “2014 Act”) into law.
Fiscal year taxpayers that have already filed a tax return for a period that includes a portion of 2014—for example, for a fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, taxpayers that reported a credit based upon qualified research expenses (QREs) paid or incurred during the period from April 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013—will be able to:
A taxpayer that reports a research credit on a fiscal year return—when the benefit of the credit is only to create a carryforward of the credit that can be used to reduce tax liability in a later tax year—generally does not need to file an amended return for the fiscal year to report a larger carryforward on account of the expenditures incurred subsequent to December 31, 2013.
However, the income tax return for the first tax year on which the increased carryforward amount is reported would need to explain that the increase resulted from enactment of the 2014 Act, after the original return for that year was filed.
Although the 2014 Act reinstates the research credit, expenses paid or incurred on or after January 1, 2015, will not be eligible for a research credit, unless and until a further extension of section 41 occurs. Any potential income tax benefit from a research credit for 2015 expenses would not be recognized, e.g., in estimated tax payments.
However, maintaining contemporaneous recordkeeping for research expenses throughout the next period of a lapsed credit can improve the credibility of any later claims.
Because the 2014 Act did not extend bonus depreciation until December 2014, some taxpayers filed tax returns for fiscal years, or short tax years, ending in 2014 without taking into account bonus depreciation on calendar year 2014 qualified property, and are now in the position of having not taken the full amount of depreciation allowable on that property.
Alternatively, fiscal year taxpayers may have elected out of bonus depreciation for all property within a class because the statute did not apply to 2014 qualified property at the time the tax return was filed.
If a taxpayer does not elect out of bonus depreciation and does not deduct the bonus depreciation allowable on the property, the basis of the property is still reduced by that “allowable” depreciation amount, which could affect the amount of gain or loss recognized on a later disposition. A taxpayer may elect out of bonus depreciation on any (or all) classes of property that it places in service in a tax year.
For example, a taxpayer could elect out of the bonus deduction on all of its 5-year MACRS property while taking the bonus on its 7-year property. This election is required to be made with the timely filed tax return (including extensions) for the year the qualified property is placed in service, by attaching a statement to the tax return identifying the classes of property to which the election applies.
The IRS and Treasury have not yet issued guidance that provides relief for fiscal year taxpayers that elected out of bonus depreciation (because the statute had not been extended) or that have filed a tax return for a period that includes bonus depreciation on assets placed in service during 2013, but not assets placed in service in 2014—for example, for taxpayers with a fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, and that claimed bonus depreciation only on assets placed in service during the period from April 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013.
In Rev. Proc. 2011-26, the IRS addressed a similar dilemma involving bonus depreciation for taxpayers with a fiscal year ending in 2010, or a tax year beginning and ending in 2010. In that revenue procedure, the following options were provided:
1. If bonus depreciation was not claimed on the return for some or all qualified property, and an election out of bonus was not made for that property, the taxpayer can claim the additional bonus deduction either by:
2. If bonus depreciation was not claimed for any qualified property in a class (either for 2009 qualified property or 2010 qualified property), and an election out of bonus depreciation was not made for that property, and the taxpayer did claim some depreciation on such property (other than bonus depreciation), the taxpayer will be deemed to have made an election out of bonus depreciation for that class of property for that tax year if it did not use the procedures described immediately above, in the prescribed time.
3. A taxpayer that made an election out of bonus depreciation for one or more classes of property on its timely filed return could revoke that election. The revocation was accomplished by filing an amended return claiming the correct amount of bonus depreciation for that class of property (on both the 2009 and the 2010 qualified property). The amended return generally needed to be filed before the taxpayer filed its tax return for the following tax year, but provided a later deadline for taxpayers that may have already filed their next year’s return.
Rev. Proc. 2011-26 does not apply to taxpayers with fiscal years, or short years, ended in 2014. However, the alternatives under Option 1, above, are supported by current authorities.
Thus, a taxpayer generally is permitted to either file an automatic accounting method change under section 6.01 of Rev. Proc. 2015-14 to claim additional bonus depreciation on 2014 qualified property, or file an amended return (before the filing of the next year’s return) to claim the additional bonus depreciation.
Option 2 and Option 3, above, are however currently not available unless (and until) additional guidance is issued. The IRS has informally announced that it is working on similar guidance for 2014.
For more information, contact a KPMG tax professional:
Eric Lucas | +1 (202) 533-3023 | firstname.lastname@example.org
David Culp | +1 (202) 533-4104 | email@example.com
Tyrone Montague | +1 (212) 954 6818 | firstname.lastname@example.org
© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.