The Kolkata Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal addressed the functional, asset and risk analysis with respect to a taxpayer and its related parties and relied in part on the UN Transfer Pricing manual and the OECD’s Transfer Pricing guidelines (2010). The tribunal rejected the tax authorities’ contention that the amount of risk borne by the entities depended on which party contracted with the customer—i.e., the argument that the contracting party bears more risk compared to the subcontracting party.
The case identifying information is: DCIT v. ITC Infotech India Ltd. (ITA No. 2222 & 2223/Kol/2010)
The taxpayer provides information technology services to customers, and uses marketing support services of its U.S. and U.K. related parties.
The Transfer Pricing Officer proposed an adjustment with respect to payments made for accounting management charges paid by the taxpayer to its subsidiaries, and proposed revising the revenue-sharing model without considering the functional and risk profile of the taxpayer and its related parties and the global business model that they followed.
The tribunal held that while the business models were “optically different” in terms of the contracting party, the functional and risk profile of both the taxpayer and the related parties remained the same in both models. The tribunal “deleted” the transfer pricing adjustment made concerning the accounting management charges.
The tribunal’s decision—relying in part on the UN and OECD guidelines—found the conduct of the taxpayer and its related parties is to be given due cognizance, which is the same under both business models.
Read a January 2015 report [PDF 460 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: The Kolkata Tribunal confirms that functional, asset and risk analysis should be given due importance over the business models agreed between the taxpayer and its associated entities
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.