The UK government today issued items that focus on multinational corporations and follow the OECD’s base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) action plan—one issuance being a consultation document concerning hybrid mismatch arrangements, and the other being the Autumn Statement 2014 that includes provisions relating to country-by-country reporting, the hybrid mismatch proposal, and a rule to address “diverted profits tax.”
The Chancellor today issued the Autumn Statement 2014 [PDF 1.87 MB] that includes measures reflecting the hybrid mismatch proposal, country-by-country reporting and the “diverted profits tax.”
The “diverted profits tax” would apply to a company’s profits that have been diverted from the UK through complex arrangements and would apply to both UK and foreign multinational companies. For example, if a company conducts a lot of business activity in the UK (e.g., sales) but can avoid paying corporation tax by moving profits generated in the UK to other countries through the manipulation of the international tax rules, the UK would be able to tax those profits at a rate of 25%. Read more on the KPMG Autumn Statement webpage.
HM Treasury and HM Revenue & Customs today released for consultation and comments a report concerning the UK’s contribution to the ongoing OECD work on a commentary to the G20-OECD report on BEPS Action 2 (Neutralise the Effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements) and on issues relating to implementation of the recommendations contained in that report which will guide development of legislation in the UK.
As noted in today’s HM Treasury report [PDF 566 KB], the BEPS proposals would aim to neutralise the effect of hybrid mismatch arrangements in accordance with recommendations of Action 2 of the G20-OECD BEPS project.
The aim would be to address aggressive tax planning when, within a multinational group, either one party gets a tax deduction for a payment while the other party does not have a taxable receipt, or when there is more than one tax deduction for the same expense. Introduction of the proposed rules would aim to eliminate any tax advantage arising from the use of hybrid entities and instruments and encourage businesses to adopt less complicated and more transparent cross-border investment structures.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.