Recent immigration developments in Australia include new surcharges for credit card payments of visa applications and heightened efforts to prevent visa-related fraud.
In Australia, new surcharges for the use of credit cards when paying for visa applications and an increased focus on identity fraud prevention by visa applicants are the subjects of recent developments covered in this Flash International Executive Alert.
Despite a slight delay in introducing surcharges for payments made by credit card with respect to visa applications – which provided a brief respite from higher charges that apply to such applications – these surcharges are now being applied, potentially raising visa-related costs slightly for organizations and individuals, should they choose to make payment in this form.
The need to supply accurate and truthful documents in support of visa applications is critical. Failure to comply with the rules could carry serious penalties and repercussions.
Australia’s Department of Immigration and Border Protection (DIBP) had delayed the introduction of credit card surcharge fees, which was due to commence on 22 March 2014. Previously, DIBP had announced that it would apply a surcharge on all clients paying by credit card for visas and other related services from 22 March 2014. However, the amount of the surcharge was not disclosed. This surcharge was coming on top of higher visa application charges which were introduced last year.1
The surcharge rates have now been introduced as of 19 April 2014. According to the DIBP Web page 2, if you pay for your visa application by credit card, the following surcharges will apply:
Visa and MasterCard – 1.08%
American Express and JCB – 1.99%
Diners Club International – 2.91%.
Further expansion of what was previously known as the Fraud Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4020 – now referenced as the Integrity PIC – took effect on 22 March 2014.3
This recent measure expands on the existing focus on creating penalties for applicants providing bogus documents or information that are false and misleading for certain visas. The recent change now specifically focuses on identity fraud and has a 10-year exclusion period for those who do not meet the criteria. In addition, PIC 4020 criteria have now been extended to several additional visas (Special Program subclass 416 visa; Working Holiday subclass 417 visa; Work and Holiday subclass 462 visa; and Superyacht Crew subclass 488 visa). The Integrity PIC already applies to a range of visas including the Temporary Work (Skilled) subclass 457 visa, Employer Nomination Scheme subclass 186 visa, and the Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme subclass 187 visa.
Under DIBP’s new requirements, applicants (including accompanying family members) must satisfy the Minister as to their identity for these affected visas.
Visa applicants need to be vigilant and meticulous with respect to the information and documents provided in a visa application so that they are accurate and genuine (including in respect of family members). Importantly, if bogus documents or false or misleading information are provided (either for the current application or in relation to a visa that was held or applied for in the 12 months before the application was made), then all applicants may have their visa applications refused and may also be subject to exclusion periods.
An example of where PIC 4020 could come into consideration is where an applicant has failed to declare a criminal conviction on an existing subclass 457 visa application (even if this has been done by oversight). If the applicant then makes an application for permanent residence under the Employer Nomination Scheme, the mandatory requirement to obtain police clearances will often result in the conviction being subsequently disclosed.
In such cases, even if the conviction is considered relatively minor, the visa application would be in jeopardy of being refused as well as resulting in a three-year exclusion period for the applicant and possibly his or her included family members.
More broadly, employers need to be mindful as to privacy issues that may arise where the employee or his or her family have declarations in relation to sensitive issues such as a criminal records or health conditions, and with respect to how this is best managed as part of the process.
3 For more information see: https://www.immi.gov.au/Live/Pages/document-fraud.aspx and http://www.immi.gov.au/migrants/family/fraud-pic.htm .
This article is adapted, with permission, from Migration Newsflash (27 March 2014), published by the KPMG International member firm in Australia.
For further information or assistance, please contact your local IES professional, or one of the following IES professionals with the KPMG International member firm in Australia:
Michael Wall (Immigration)
Tel. +61 2 9335 8625
Andy Hutt (Tax)
Tel. +61 2 9335 8655
Melbourne and Adelaide
John Unger (Immigration)
Tel. +61 3 9288 5725
Ben Travers (Tax)
Tel. +61 3 9288 5279
Rachel Williamson (Immigration)
Tel. +61 8 9263 7455
Tim Sandow (Tax)
Tel. +61 8 8236 3234
Dan Hodgson (Tax)
Tel. +61 8 9278 2053
Stephen Abbott (Immigration)
Tel. +61 7 3233 9554
Trevor Pascall (Tax)
Tel. +61 7 3233 3251
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Australia.
© 2016 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
Flash Alert is an Global Mobility Services publication of KPMG LLPs Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.