The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today affirmed a decision of the U.S. Tax Court that found the taxpayer was not entitled to capital gains treatment of patent-generated royalties because the taxpayer had not transferred “all substantial rights” in the patent so as to warrant capital gains treatment of the royalties.
The case is: Cooper v. Commissioner, No. 15-70863 (9th Cir. December 15, 2017). Read the Ninth Circuit’s decision [PDF 146 KB] that includes a partial dissent and partial concurrence.
The taxpayer held patents that generated significant royalties. He and his wife incorporated and transferred their rights to the patents to an entity that was formed by the taxpayer and two other individuals. A patent holder that has effective control of a corporation is determined to retain the right to retrieve ownership of the patent at will. In such instances, there has not been a transfer of “all substantial rights” to the patent as required for capital gains treatment of the patent-generated royalties.
In this case, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Tax Court’s conclusion that the taxpayer had not transferred all substantial rights to the patents to the corporation because the other two individuals acted at the taxpayer’s direction, did not exercise independent judgment, and returned the patents to the taxpayer when requested, for no consideration.
Other issues in this case concerned a denied deduction for a nonbusiness bad debt and an accuracy-related penalty.
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.