The House Ways and Means Committee today approved, by a party-line vote of 24 to 16, H.R. 1, the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” and ordered the bill to be reported.
The committee’s bill reflects two amendments to the initial Chairman’s “mark” that were approved by party-line votes: an amendment offered by Chairman Brady the evening of November 6 (read TaxNewsFlash), and a “manager’s amendment” that was voted on shortly before the conclusion of the markup (read TaxNewsFlash). Very generally, some of the amendments to the mark include:
KPMG will be issuing a report soon with initial observations and analysis on H.R. 1, as approved by Ways and Means.
On November 2, Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) released H.R. 1, the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” as well as a section-by-section summary (summary) of the proposed tax reform legislation.
On November 3, Brady released amended legislative text of H.R. 1, which revised the text released on November 2, and constituted the so-called “Chairman’s mark.” The Chairman’s mark served as the starting point for consideration of the legislation by the Ways and Means Committee.
On November 6, Chairman Brady offered an amendment in the nature of a substitute, which was approved by the committee by a party-line vote.
On November 9, Chairman Brady offered a “manager’s amendment,” which was approved by the committee on a party-line vote shortly before the committee voted to approve H.R.1, as amended, and report it to the House floor.
Now that the Ways and Means Committee has approved the bill and ordered it to be reported, the bill proceeds to the House Rules Committee. The Rules Committee determines the rules for considering bills on the House floor, including the time allocated for debate. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has announced that the full House would vote on the tax bill next week.
As for the Senate, Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT) released his mark this evening. His mark differs from the Ways and Means bill in significant respects. KPMG will be releasing a separate report with preliminary analysis and observations on Chairman Hatch’s mark shortly, including observations regarding how it differs from the Ways and Means bill.
Finance Committee action is expected to begin next week. During the Finance Committee’s markup, it is possible (if not likely) that amendments might be made. After the Senate Finance Committee finishes its markup, it would vote on its bill and, if approved, order the bill to be reported. During consideration by the full Senate, it is possible (if not likely) that amendments would be adopted on the Senate floor. It is not yet certain when Senate floor action would commence or when a vote on final passage would take place. The Senate bill potentially could be very different from the House bill.
For tax reform to become law, the House and the Senate ultimately would have to pass identical legislation and send it to the president. There are different mechanisms by which this could be accomplished. It is possible that a conference committee might be convened to work out the differences between the two bills (as was done in the 1986 Act). However, other approaches might be employed. For example, House and Senate policymakers might negotiate behind the scenes before final Senate passage in an effort to produce a final amendment that would result in a bill that could pass the Senate and then pass the House. Regardless of the mechanism used, finalizing a bill that could pass both the House and the Senate could be challenging. The often-stated goal of Republican congressional leadership is to pass a bill and send it the president for his signature prior to the end of 2017. The aggressive schedule outlined by House and Senate leaders is aimed at meeting this deadline. Significant hiccups at any of the many junctures along the path to enactment could derail this tight timeline and push the process over into 2018 or lead to the demise of the bill.
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.