Congress returns to Washington this week and will immediately be forced to confront a number of issues, including two looming deadlines:
Also, Congress is likely to consider hurricane relief legislation for those areas affected by Hurricane Harvey. Historically, such legislation has often included significant targeted tax provisions.
Further, legislative action is needed to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and to fund the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) before September 30.
Meanwhile, Republicans are also expected to continue their efforts to enact tax reform legislation. Additionally, it is possible—although very unclear—that Congress could return to its effort to address health care (and related tax issues) this fall.
Here are just a few things to watch this fall on the tax front.
Republicans remain intensely interested in enacting major tax legislation soon. Indeed, many Republicans view passing such legislation prior to the next elections (in November 2018) as a political imperative.
It is possible, and perhaps likely, that tax legislation would proceed under budget reconciliation. That would require passage of a new budget resolution for federal fiscal year 2018, which could prove difficult because it would have implications for broader spending issues.1 Thus, it will be important to monitor congressional efforts with respect to a budget. While using budget reconciliation for tax legislation would allow Republicans to pass a bill in the Senate with only Republican support, it could limit how long provisions that reduce tax revenues under budget rules could be in effect and could otherwise affect the substance of tax reform legislation.
On July 27, shortly before leaving for the August “work period” (i.e., recess), the so-called “Big Six” released a one-page joint statement on Republican tax reform efforts. The “Big Six” are:
As previously reported—read TaxNewsFlash—the joint statement highlighted broad areas of consensus among the Big Six, but did not include technical details or potential revenue offsets. Further, although the statement indicated that “priority is being placed on permanence,” it did not squarely rule out the possibility that some proposals might be temporary in nature. The statement also expressed the expectation that legislation would move through the tax-writing committees this fall, under regular order, and then to the House and Senate floors.
In terms of what to expect in the immediate future, the tax negotiators could release more details of their tax plan later this fall. It does not appear, however, that they have yet reached agreement even among themselves on many important details of a tax reform plan. Thus, exactly when new details might be released and whether the Big Six will defer to the tax writing committees to reveal further details remain open questions.
For tax reform efforts to proceed, the House and Senate tax-writing committees inevitably must release more detailed descriptions of tax reform proposals and then perhaps meet to “mark up” major tax legislation at some point this year. The committee staffs continue to work on details of various options for tax reform.
It is important to bear in mind that:
Thus, while it is quite likely that there will be significant developments with respect to major tax legislation when Congress returns, the substance, size, and timing of such legislation continue to be quite uncertain. Likewise, it is not clear whether any such legislation would be temporary or permanent (or some combination of the two), whether it would be more in the nature of “reform” or “cuts” (or perhaps a combination), and whether it ultimately would make it to the “finish line” of the legislative process and become law.
Read more about the possible process associated with tax reform, why enacting tax reform is difficult and takes time, and what the budget process involves in a set of “frequently asked questions” reported in TaxNewsFlash.
1 Efforts to possibly use the fiscal year 2017 budget for tax reform appear to
have been impeded by a recent ruling by the Senate parliamentarian regarding
the expiration of that budget.
Legislative efforts to address healthcare might—or might not—resume after the recess. The Senate’s recent failure to pass healthcare legislation has not quieted discussion of healthcare issues in Congress, the administration, the healthcare markets, or among the public.2
If Congress does continue efforts to address healthcare, the fate of tax provisions in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) could be brought to the forefront again—including whether to repeal the net investment income tax, the medical device excise tax, and other ACA taxes and fees. If healthcare is not revisited or if these issues are not dealt with in healthcare legislation, Congress will need to decide whether to address them in the context of other tax legislation (such as tax reform), or whether to leave current law as is.
Read a KPMG report: Taxes and Healthcare Reform: Now What? [PDF 93 KB]
2 The Senate parliamentarian recently ruled that the fiscal year 2017 budget
(which was being used for healthcare legislation) expires at the end of this
month. Thus, if Congress continues to seek to use the fiscal year 2017 budget
to pass healthcare legislation in the Senate with only Republican votes, Senate
action likely would need to take place by September 30.
The taxes that are dedicated to the airport and airway trust fund (as well as the authorization of FAA programs) are scheduled to expire on September 30, 2017. Thus, unless legislative action is taken, the following taxes will expire as of that date:
Keep in mind that the Trump Administration has proposed legislative changes to the current regime of ticket taxes and aviation passenger as part of a new funding model. Read TaxNewsFlash on the administration’s proposal. However, the legislative prospects of such changes are not clear.
A number of tax incentives expired at the end of last year (i.e., 2016). Read a list of these incentives and their scheduled expiration dates in a KPMG report: Tax incentives scheduled to expire at end of 2016 [PDF 1 MB]
In addition, the current moratorium on the medical device excise tax expires at the end of 2017. Thus, absent legislative action, this tax would start to apply (again) with respect to sales of taxable medical devices made after December 31, 2017. Further, without intervention by Congress, the annual health insurer fee that was suspended for 2017 would resume effect, requiring health insurers to pay the fee on their proportionate share of business in 2018.
It is possible, although far from certain, that Congress might take up tax legislation before the end of the year (possibly very late in the year) to address some or all of these time sensitive provisions. For example, if Congress has made significant progress on tax reform by the end of the year but determines that enactment in 2017 still remains unlikely, it might decide to move legislation late in the year to extend some expired provisions (potentially retroactively) and/or to extend the moratorium on the medical device excise tax. Nonetheless, congressional leaders also may prefer to address these kinds of issues in the context of continued efforts to achieve 2018 tax reform or healthcare reform (in part to maintain momentum for those initiatives). Thus, the prospects of such a bill are very uncertain.
In 2016 (in the previous Congress), legislation was introduced in the House and Senate that contained technical corrections to various recent tax laws. Read about that legislation in TaxNewsFlash. No legislative action has yet been taken with respect to that legislation, and similar legislation has not yet been reintroduced in this Congress.
Technical corrections might be included in tax reform legislation. However, given the pressure for technical corrections with respect to some relatively new laws (such as the partnership audit rules, which generally will apply for returns filed for partnership tax years beginning after 2017), it is possible that technical corrections might be attached to another legislative vehicle if an appropriate vehicle emerges that is moving more quickly than tax reform. For example, if tax-related hurricane relief legislation or legislation regarding the medical device excise tax moratorium moves more quickly than tax reform, technical corrections potentially might be attached.
Regulatory reforms. September 18, 2017, is the date by which Treasury’s final report under Executive Order 13789 is due. That executive order directed the Treasury to examine recent tax regulations to determine whether any of the regulatory projects: (1) imposed an undue financial burden on U.S. taxpayers; (2) added undue complexity to the federal tax laws; or (3) exceeded the statutory authority of the IRS.
Earlier this summer, the IRS released Notice 2017-38, which identified eight regulations for burden reduction and indicated that Treasury will propose reforms—ranging from streamlining “problematic rule provisions” to full repeal of the regulations—in the final report submitted to the president. Read more about Notice 2017-38 in TaxNewsFlash.
IRS Commissioner. IRS Commissioner John Koskinen’s five-year term at the helm of the IRS ends November 12, 2017. It is not yet known who the next commissioner will be.
For more information, contact a tax professional with the Federal Legislative and Regulatory Services group of KPMG’s Washington National Tax:
John Gimigliano | +1 202 533 4022 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Carol Kulish | +1 202 533 5829 | email@example.com
Tom Stout |+1 202 533 4148 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Jennifer Bonar Gray | +1 202 533 3489 | email@example.com
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.